C. Goller, R. Letz, K. Mayr, and J. Schumann. SETHEO V3.2: Recent devleopments. In [2], pages 778--782. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Satchmo -- The Compiling and Functional Variants - Tim Geisler, Sven Panne.. (1997) (5 citations) (Correct)
....and therefore usually need significantly different times to find a proof, Functional Satchmo solved only a proper subset of the problems Compiling Satchmo solved. 4.2. Experimental Results Outside the Competition In a comparison [15] of Compiling Satchmo with MGTP G [8] Otter [12] and SETHEO [6], using the TPTP Problem Library [17] as a benchmark, Compiling Satchmo has turned out to be the most efficient for range restricted problems and for non nesting problems, i.e. precisely those for which Satchmo had been designed. Experimental results with Functional Satchmo after the competition ....
C. Goller, R. Letz, K. Mayr, and J. Schumann. SETHEO V3.2: Recent devleopments. In [2], pages 778--782.
Efficient Model Generation through Compilation - Heribert Schütz, Tim Geisler (1997) (Correct)
.... indexing in the dynamic database of certain Prolog systems, we replace terms of the form neg(p( by neg p( 5 Performance Evaluation We have performed extensive benchmarks for different variants of Satchmo and also for other well known theorem provers (MGTP G [14] Otter [17] and SETHEO [11]) We report the most interesting results here. There is no standard benchmark for model generation, but we also did not want to construct a set of benchmark problems ourselves to avoid a bias in favor of our techniques. Therefore we have chosen to use problems from the widely accepted TPTP ....
C. Goller, R. Letz, K. Mayr, and J. Schumann. SETHEO V3.2: Recent devleopments. In Automated Deduction --- CADE-12, Springer LNAI 814, pages 778--782, 1994.
Efficient Model Generation through Compilation - Schütz, Geisler (1996) (Correct)
.... in the dynamic database of certain Prolog systems, we replace terms of the form neg(p( by neg p( 5 Performance Evaluation We have performed extensive benchmarks for different variants of Satchmo and also for other well known theorem provers (MGTP G [7] Otter [9] and SETHEO [6]) We report the most interesting results here. There is no standard benchmark for model generation, but we also did not want to construct a set of benchmark problems ourselves to avoid a bias in favor of our techniques. Therefore we have chosen to use problems from the widely accepted TPTP ....
C. Goller, R. Letz, K. Mayr, and J. Schumann. SETHEO V3.2: Recent devleopments. In Automated Deduction --- CADE-12, Springer LNAI 814, pages 778--782, 1994.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC