| R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three system for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79-130, Spring 1994. |
.... only possible once for each pair of home agents (up to the capacity of the key cache) 1 We have formally verified the correctness of our protocol using the finite state analysis tool Mur [7] While formal methods have been successfully used to analyze key exchange and authentication protocols [8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 12], this is the first Diffie Hellman based key exchange protocol that has been analyzed with Mur . In addition, previously analyzed protocols such as SSL [14] and contract signing [15, 16] involve only two parties while Mobile IP has four (two mobile nodes and their associated home agents) ....
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, J. Millen. Three Systems for Cryptographic Protocol Analysis. In Journal of Cryptography, 7(2):79-130, 1994.
....protocols have been adapted for establishing the secrecy authenticity of the cryptographic protocols. Approaches can be broadly categorized as follows: 1) State Machine Models [11, 14] 2) Calculus Based Models [1] 3) Methods Based on Belief Logics [5] and (4) Theorem Prover based Methods [8, 3, 16, 4, 19, 9]. 17] provides an annotated bibliography. In the area provably correct systems, there have been quite considerable efforts in the speci cation and veri cation of reactive systems [7] The family of synchronous languages [2] has been well studied for the design and synthesis of provably correct ....
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows and J. Millen, Three Systems for Cryptographic Protocol Analysis, J Cryptology (1994), 7:79-130.
....previous attacks show that it is extremely di#cult for a protocol designer to determine whether his protocol is sound, even for very simple protocols. Some researchers proposed formal techniques for analyzing the soundness of protocols, such as the BAN logic [4] or the three systems presented in [8]. Another approach for the protocol designer is to try to find flaws in his m Alice m # Bob Carol Figure 2: Lenstra s attack. protocol with all his experience of good and bad practice. In [1] Abadi and Needham give general rules helping protocol ....
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79--130, 1994.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three system for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79-130, Spring 1994.
No context found.
Kemmerer, R., Meadows, C., Millen, J.: Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. J. Cryptology 7 (1994) 79--130
No context found.
Richard Kemmerer, Catherine Meadows, and Jon Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79--130, 1994.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79--130, 1994.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79--130, 1994.
No context found.
Kemmerer, R., Meadows, C., Millen, J.: Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. J. Cryptology 7 (1994) 79--130
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79--130, 1994.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. J. Cryptology, 7(2):79-130, 1994.
No context found.
Kemmerer, R. A., Meadows, C., and Millen, J. K. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology 7, 2 (1994), 79--130.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79--130, 1994.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79--130, 1994.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. J. Cryptology, 7(2):79--130, 1994.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79--130, 1994.
No context found.
Kemmerer, R., Meadows, C. and Millen, J. (1994) Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. J. Cryptol., 7, 79--130.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79--130, 1994.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79--130, Spring 1994.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three system for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79--130, 1994.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79-130, 1994.
No context found.
Kemmerer, R. A., Meadows, C., and Millen, J. K. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology 7, 2 (1994), 79--130.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. Journal of Cryptology, 7(2):79--130, 1994.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. "Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis". J. Cryptology, 7(2):79--130, 1994.
No context found.
R. Kemmerer, C. Meadows, and J. Millen. Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis. J. Cryptology, 7(2):79-130, 1994.
First 50 documents Next 50
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC