| Visa International and MasterCard, "Secure Electronic Transactions Protocol Specification," http://www.setco.org/set specifications.html . |
....2.1 Technical Scope Secure session protocols have attracted a lot of research attention, and several effective session security protocols have been standardized, so naive Sign Encrypt is not a problem in session security. Sessionsecurity standards, like Kerberos [19] TLS [5] and SET [28], give straightforward, out of the box solutions. For files and one way messaging, though, current security standards give developers only a kind of toolbox support, with a variety of security options, but with no clear or firm guidance about how to combine the options to make Sign Encrypt an ....
Visa International and MasterCard, "Secure Electronic Transactions Protocol Specification," http://www.setco.org/set specifications.html .
....seem possible, because account initiation is less a technical scaling problem than a social one. 3. 2 Authenticating the CA It is a telling and ominous fact that every electroniccommerce protocol specification explicitly disavows all responsibility for the validation of the Root CA s public key [14, 16, 22, 23]. Outside the scope of this document is a typical waiver. 14] Before using a public key certificate, a user must authenticate it by checking its certifying signature and the signature on each public key in its chain of certifying authorities. It s commonly forgotten that public key ....
Visa International and MasterCard, "Secure Electronic Transactions Protocol Specification."
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC