| The ATM Forum, ATM User-Network Interface Version 3.1 Specification, ATM Forum, Sep. 1994; |
....segment size allows more data to be sent in each segment, reducing consequently the relative cost of the IP and TCP headers [5] A. Available bandwidth for the physical, ATM and adaptation layers The tests were accomplished using 155Mbit s SONET STS 3c OC 3c interfaces. The format of this frame [6] is shown in Figure 1. The total size of the SONET STS3c OC 3c frame is: 9 x (9 261) 2430 bytes. The overhead consists of: The section overhead: 27 bytes The line overhead: 54 bytes The path overhead: 9 bytes Then, the maximum available bandwidth (BD) for the ATM layer is given by: ....
The ATM Forum, ATM User-Network Interface Version 3.1 Specification, ATM Forum, Sep. 1994;
....ATM and AAL layer The calculation of the overhead at the physical, ATM and AAL 5 layers is derived from the payload to PDU size ratio, according to the respective protocol formats. The physical layer used in our testbeds is based on a 155 Mbit s SONET STS 3c OC 3c Physical Layer Interface [20]. Its frame format is depicted in Figure 4. The total length of the SONET STS 3c OC 3c frame is 9 (9 261) 2430 bytes. The total overhead consists of: section overhead (27 bytes) line overhead (54 bytes) path overhead (9 bytes) Therefore, the available bandwidth (BW) left to the ....
The ATM Forum, ATM User-Network Interface Version 3.1 Specification, September 1994
No context found.
The ATM Forum, ATM User-Network Interface Version 3.1 (UNI 3.1) Specification, July 21, 1994.
No context found.
The ATM Forum, ATM User-Network Interface Version 3.1 (UNI 3.1) Specification, July 21, 1994.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC