| R. Schack, T. A. Brun, and C. M. Caves, "Quantum Bayes Rule," Phys. Rev. A 64, 014305-1--014305-4 (2001). |
....what we are doing is grounding the phenomenon with respect to his state of belief. The solution, at least in the case of quantum state tomography [31] is found through a quantum mechanical version of de Finetti s classic theorem on unknown probabilities. This reports work from Refs. 32] and [33]. Maybe one of the most interesting things about the theorem is that it fails for Hilbert spaces over the field of real numbers, suggesting that perhaps the whole discipline of quantum information might not be well defined in that imaginary world. Finally, in Section 10 The Oyster and the ....
....completely banished from its formulation. In this case, the end product of the e#ort will be a single quantum state used for describing the phenomenon namely, the state that actually captures the describer s overall set of beliefs throughout. This Section reports the work of Ref. 32] and [33], where such a project is carried out for the experimental practice of quantum state tomography [31] The usual description of tomography is this. A device of some sort, say a nonlinear optical medium driven by a laser, repeatedly prepares many instances of a quantum system, say many temporally ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
R. Schack, T. A. Brun, and C. M. Caves, "Quantum Bayes Rule," Phys. Rev. A 64, 014305-1--014305-4 (2001).
....in the background with extra knowledge of the system being measured or manipulated. The solution, at least in the case of quantum state tomography [13] is found through a quantum mechanical version of de Finetti s classic theorem on unknown probabilities. This reports work from Refs. 17] and [18]. Maybe one of the most interesting things about the theorem is that it fails for Hilbert spaces over the field of real numbers, suggesting that perhaps the whole discipline of quantum information might not be well defined in that imaginary world. Finally, in Section 8 The Oyster and the ....
....state completely banished from its formulation. In this case, the end product of the effort will be a single quantum state used for describing the phenomenon namely, the state that actually captures the describer s state of knowledge throughout. This Section reports the work of Ref. 17] and [18], where such a project is carried out for the experimental practice of quantum state tomography [13] The usual description of 33 y y y Figure 2: To make sense of quantum tomography, must we go to the extreme of imagining a man in the box who has a better description of the systems than ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
R. Schack, T. A. Brun, and C. M. Caves, "Quantum Bayes Rule," Phys. Rev. A 64, 0143051 --014305-4 (2001).
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC