Steriade, Donca. 2000. The Phonology of Perceptibility Effects: the P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.

 Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles  

This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Transparency, Strict Locality, and Targeted Constraints - Eric Bakovic And   (Correct)

....difficulty of [ HI, ATR] vowels and their perceptual similarity to otherwise identical [ HI, ATR] vowels. This integration of articulatory and perceptual factors is a central property of the theory of targeted constraints, one that it shares with the Licensing by Cue framework of Jun (1995) Steriade (1997, 2000), and others (though the precise manner of integration differs sharply from other theories; see Wilson, in preparation, for discussion) In section 3, we describe in detail the interaction between AGREE(ATR) and #NO( HI, ATR) that gives rise to transparent high vowels, and thereby give ....

.... from 7 on the second scale in (8) 5 Perceptual similarity metrics such as F1 Sim are closely related to the Minimal Distance constraints of Flemming s (1995) OT Dispersion Theory, which are based on binary feature decompositions of scalar auditory dimensions, and to the licensing constraints of Steriade (1997, 2000), which are defined in terms of scales (or P maps ) that plot the perceptual distances between potentially contrastive segments in various phonological contexts. But F1 Sim is not itself a constraint, nor is the articulatory markedness statement HI ATR in (7) Rather, F1 Sim and HI ATR together ....

Steriade, Donca. 2000. The Phonology of Perceptibility Effects: the P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC