F. H. van Eemeren and R. Grootendorst. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. LEA, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1992. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Desiderata for Agent Argumentation Protocols - McBurney, Parsons (2002) (5 citations) (Correct)
....rights and responsibilities, and these should be known to all. 6. Clarity of Argumentation Theory: A dialectical system should conform, at least at the outset, to a stated theory of argument, for example Hitchcock s Principles for Rational Mutual Inquiry [15] or the persuasion dialogue rules of [9]. This model is presented in [25] Note that there is no consensus among philosophers over distinctions, if any, between the words dialogical and dialectical [5, p. 337] The reason for this is so that all participants know, and adhere to, their dialectical obligations, agree on rules of ....
F. H. van Eemeren and R. Grootendorst. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. LEA, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1992.
Desiderata for Agent Argumentation Protocols (Tracking.. - McBurney, Parsons.. (2001) (Correct)
....rights and responsibilities, and these should be known to all. 6. Clarity of Argumentation Theory: A dialectical system should conform, at least at the outset, to a stated theory of argument, for example Hitchcock s Principles for Rational Mutual Inquiry [13] or the persuasion dialogue rules of [7]. The reason for this is so that all participants know, and adhere to, their dialectical obligations, agree on rules of inference and procedure, and have reasonable expectations of the responses of others. For example, an agent should know in advance of making an assertion that its statement may ....
F. H. van Eemeren and R. Grootendorst. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1992.
Truth or Consequences: Using argumentation to reason about risk - McBurney, Parsons (1999) (1 citation) (Correct)
.... [11] Arne Naess rules of precizating statements [47] the Dialectical Argumentation of Nicholas Rescher [60] the Dialogue Logic of Paul Lorenzen and his colleagues [41] Else Barth and Erik Krabbe s Formal Dialectics [4] and the Pragma Dialectics of Frans van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst [71]. We are currently examining these various approaches to see which, if any, is approprate for application to design of intelligent risk systems. In addition, Verheij [75] argues that new kinds of user interfaces are required for argumentation systems, and he reports on several approaches in this ....
F. H. van Eemeren and R. Grootendorst. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1992.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC