W. Rehg. Reason and rhetoric in Habermas's Theory of Argumentation. In W. Jost and M. J. Hyde, editors, Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time: A Reader, pages 358--377. Yale University Press, New Haven, CN, USA, 1997. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Representing Epistemic Uncertainty by means of Dialectical.. - McBurney, Parsons (1 citation) (Correct)
....to permit participant discussion over the modality dictionaries, which are presently assumed to have been agreed by the participants. In other work [55] we have presented a formal language in which arguments over the acceptability of rules of inference may be conducted. Secondly, William Rehg [69] 48 has demonstrated the rationality of incorporation of non deductive and rhetorical devices (such as epideictic speech and appeals to emotions) in dialectical argument and decision making, and we seek a means to incorporate such devices in the Agora. For example, in scientific domains ....
W. Rehg. Reason and rhetoric in Habermas's Theory of Argumentation. In W. Jost and M. J. Hyde, editors, Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time: A Reader, pages 358--377. Yale University Press, New Haven, CN, USA, 1997.
Truth or Consequences: Using argumentation to reason about risk - McBurney, Parsons (1999) (1 citation) (Correct)
....more precise. It would be interesting to explore the relationship of these models to the argumentation approaches adopted in Artificial Intelligence, but we have not done this here. 18 The use of assessment here is analogous to the concept of valuation in mathematical logic [55] 19 Rehg [58], following Habermas [27] has referred to this as monological argumentation, a term we have not used because it may give the misleading impression of sound inference. 12 by a proponent. Indeed, members of an audience may advance counter claims of their own, or rebuttals and undercutting ....
W. Rehg. Reason and rhetoric in Habermas's Theory of Argumentation. In W. Jost and M. J. Hyde, editors, Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time: A Reader, pages 358--377. Yale University Press, New Haven, CN, USA, 1997.
Risk Agoras: Dialectical Argumentation for Scientific Reasoning - McBurney, Parsons (2000) (1 citation) (Correct)
....definition of the Risk Agora enables contestation and defeasibility of scientific claims. Our system therefore operationalizes the two normative principles of conduct for scientific discourses presented in Section 2.1. We are currently exploring a number of refinements to the Agora. Firstly, Rehg (1997) has demonstrated the rationality of incorporation of rhetorical devices (such as epideictic speech and appeals to emotions) in dialectical argument and decision making, and we seek a means to incorporate such devices in the Agora. This would not be novel: the argumentation system of Reed (1998) ....
Rehg, W. 1997. Reason and rhetoric in Habermas's Theory of Argumentation. In Jost, W., and Hyde, M. J., eds., Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time: A Reader. New Haven, CN, USA: Yale University Press. 358--377.
Decision Support For Practical Reasoning: a.. - Girle, Hitchcock.. (Correct)
No context found.
Rehg, William (1997). "Reason and rhetoric in Habermas' s Theory of Argumentation." In: W. Jost and M. J. Hyde (Editors): Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time: A Reader.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC