C. Small, N. Ghosh, H. Saleed, M. Seltzer, and K. Smith. Does Systems Research Measure Up?. Tech. Rep. TR-16-97, Harvard University Computer Science, Nov., 1997. ftp://ftp.das.harvard.edu/techreports/tr-16-97.ps.gz. Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Brittle Metrics in Operating Systems Research - Mogul (1999) (11 citations) (Correct)
....papers and 28 ASPLOS 8 papers do so, as well as 20 of the 23 SOSP 16 papers. Papers in areas with widely available benchmarks seem to use them. For example, most papers about uniprocessor architecture and memory hierarchies use 1 Small et al. made a similar study of a broader set of conferences [20]. versions of the SPEC CPU benchmarks. Papers about multiprocessor systems and parallel programming mostly use a small set of parallel benchmark suites (SPLASH 2, Nasa7) although not as religiously. Papers in mainstream topics of operating systems research are fuzzier. The problem is most ....
C. Small, N. Ghosh, H. Saleed, M. Seltzer, and K. Smith. Does Systems Research Measure Up?. Tech. Rep. TR-16-97, Harvard University Computer Science, Nov., 1997. ftp://ftp.das.harvard.edu/techreports/tr-16-97.ps.gz.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC