Trubetzkoy, N. 1939. Le rapport entre le d'etermin'e, le d'eterminant et led'efini. In M'elanges de linguistique, offers 'a Charles Bally. Geneva.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

.... For instance, passivisation and argument raising present a discrepancy between case assignment and seman 6 MO is inspired by the usage of the term modifier in traditional structuralist linguistics where some authors (Bloomfield, 1933) use it for adjuncts and others also for complements (Trubetzkoy, 1939). tics. In the following we will show in which cases the above criteria are employed. 3.4.1 Syntactic Criteria In spite of the blurred distinction between complementation and adjunction, there is agreement on classifying a number of syntactic dependencies as subcases of complementation (e.g. ....

Trubetzkoy, N. 1939. Le rapport entre le d'etermin'e, le d'eterminant et led'efini. In M'elanges de linguistique, offers 'a Charles Bally. Geneva.

....by the creators of the Penn Treebank. There the difference between complements and adjuncts is encoded in the 6 MO is inspired by the usage of the term modifier in traditional structuralist linguistics where some authors (Bloomfield, 1933) use it for adjuncts and others also for complements (Trubetzkoy, 1939). hierarchical structure. Verbal complements are encoded as siblings of the verb whereas adjuncts are adjoined at a higher level. In a case of doubt, the annotators are asked to select adjunction. We consider this structural encoding less suitable for refinement than a hierarchy of functional ....

Trubetzkoy, N. 1939. Le rapport entre le d'etermin'e, le d'eterminant et led'efini. In M'elanges de linguistique, offers 'a Charles Bally. Geneva.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC