CORNELISSEN, W.; KLAASEN, A.; MATSINGER, A.; VAN WEE, G.: "How To Make Intuitive Testing More Systematic" IEEE Software, 1995, 5 (12) pp. 87-89.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....that may be useful in the future. Store these in a library so that they can be easily accessed. Step 3 associates participants to viewpoints (i.e. maps agents onto roles) It should be noted that this is not performed in an arbitrary manner. Testers exercise their skill based on experience [7]. Therefore participants should be mapped onto viewpoints with the aim of reducing pre testing costs (e.g. training) thereby choosing the right person for the job . 5. EXAMPLE : VOCAL Application To A Bank ATM System To illustrate the VOCAL process of section 4.2 we describe a simplified ....

CORNELISSEN, W.; KLAASEN, A.; MATSINGER, A.; VAN WEE, G.: "How To Make Intuitive Testing More Systematic" IEEE Software, 1995, 5 (12) pp. 87-89.

....we can approximate the amount of remaining test time. If the graph begins to flatten this can be an indication of reduced testing effectiveness. Reduced gradient when approaching the number of estimated total defects in the software signals to the process manager that testing should be halted (Cornelissen et al. 95) It must also be noted that the graph s gradient will flatten during inactive testing periods, for example, an overnight break where no testing takes place. Such periods of inactivity are indicated on the graph by un shaded areas. Flattening of the defect detection line during these periods ....

CORNELISSEN, W.; KLAASEN, A.; MATSINGER, A.; VAN WEE, G.: "How To Make Intuitive Testing More Systematic" IEEE Software, 1995, 5 (12) pp. 87 - 89.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC