BURNSTEIN, I.; SUWANASSART, T.; CARLSON, R.: "Developing A Testing Maturity Model For Software Test Process Evaluation And Improvement" Int. Test Conf., ITC 1996. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
VOCAL: A Framework For Test Identification Deployment - Duncan Pemberton And (Correct)
....to do. This implies that tests take into account user requirements, and the broad based remit of correctness. There have been some previous attempts to define testing as a life cycle activity, such as the approach proposed by Perry [29] Other work in the area of testing maturity assessment [6] has come some way to characterising the goals and objectives required for life cycle testing, though without defining a framework to implement this. Burnstein et al. 6] states that a testing process model should be acceptable to the software development community, and based around agreed ....
....as a life cycle activity, such as the approach proposed by Perry [29] Other work in the area of testing maturity assessment [6] has come some way to characterising the goals and objectives required for life cycle testing, though without defining a framework to implement this. Burnstein et al. [6], states that a testing process model should be acceptable to the software development community, and based around agreed software engineering principles and practices, whilst remaining industrially practicable. Our proposed solution addresses these problems through the construction of an ....
BURNSTEIN, I.; SUWANASSART, T.; CARLSON, R.: "Developing A Testing Maturity Model For Software Test Process Evaluation And Improvement" Int. Test Conf., ITC 1996.
VOCAL: Interactive System & Tool Support - Pemberton (Correct)
....focus. Final State : Dialog hidden NB as the above two tests have an input sequence consisting of a logical OR operator these should be run as two separate tests for each input sequence in both test specifications. 7. VOCAL Tool Support Testing tools have been described by Burnstein (Burnstein et al. 96) as fitting into one or more basic categories each supporting a different aspect of testing. Tools may be developed to support, Project Planning, helping management to define testing tasks, allocating time, resources, and personnel to the testing process. Capture Replay (Poston, 95) ....
....such testing activities have been reviewed by the Software Technology Support Center (STSC) Daich et al. 94) The tool supporting the VOCAL process has been developed to assist viewpoint identification, and instantiation. It therefore fits into the above category of project planning tools (Burnstein et al. 96) The VOCAL tool aims to assist test management by providing support for schedule prediction, test activity planning, monitoring, and reporting. Additional support for defining test requirements and objectives is provided, along with traceability identification. Test evaluation is performed by ....
BURNSTEIN, I.; SUWANASSART, T.; CARLSON, R.: "Developing A Testing Maturity Model For Software Test Process Evaluation And Improvement" Int. Test Conf., ITC 1996, Oct. 1996, Washington DC, USA, pp. 581 - 589.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC