Johanna Bryson. Hierarchy and sequence vs. full parallelism in action selection. In Intelligent Virtual Agents 2, pages 113--125, 1999. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
From SAB94 to SAB2000: What's New, Animat? - Guillot, Meyer (2000) (Correct)
.... with direct sensori motor links, thus challenging the concepts of action, attention, and selection (SETH98) Various architectures for action selection have been compared within the context of reinforcement learning (HUMP96) or from the point of view of hierarchical versus parallel organizations (BRYS00). In GONZ00, a biomimetic basal ganglia model of action selection has been embedded within the control architecture of a Khepera robot, and shown to exhibit nice properties of clean switching, lack of distortion and persistence. In particular, interesting similarities to what is observed on ....
J. Bryson. Hierarchy and Sequence vs. Full Parallelism in Action Selection. In [SAB00].
Making Modularity Work: Combining Memory Systems and Intelligent.. - Bryson (2000) Self-citation (Bryson) (Correct)
.... Modularity Work: Combining Memory Systems and Intelligent Processes in a Dialog Agent Joanna Bryson MIT AI Lab; Cambridge MA 02139; USA joanna ai.mit.edu Abstract One of the greatest obstacles to designing a mind is the complexity of integrating different process types, time frames and representational structures. This paper describes a methodology for addressing this obstacle, Behavior Oriented Designed (BOD) and ....
Joanna Bryson. Hierarchy and sequence vs. full parallelism in action selection. In Daniel Ballin, editor, Intelligent Virtual Agents 2, September 1999b.
Cross-Paradigm Analysis of Autonomous Agent Architecture - Bryson (2000) (8 citations) Self-citation (Bryson) (Correct)
.... to theoretical opposition: Is a system truly autonomous if it is forced to carry out a plan Is centralized control biologically plausible The answer to both of these questions is almost certainly yes , but space does not permit the arguments here see for example Barber and Martin (1999) and Bryson 4 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 22 (2000) respectively for some discussion. Regardless, it can be observed empirically that all autonomous agents do still have and require action selection mechanisms. In behavior based systems, these systems are often distributed across the behaviors. This may lead to some improvement of robustness, ....
Bryson, J. (1999b). Hierarchy and sequence vs. full parallelism in action selection. In Ballin, D., editor, Intelligent Virtual Agents 2.
Coordinating Very Large Groups Of Wide Area Search.. - Scerri, Liao, Lai.. (Correct)
No context found.
Johanna Bryson. Hierarchy and sequence vs. full parallelism in action selection. In Intelligent Virtual Agents 2, pages 113--125, 1999.
Challenges in Building Very Large Teams - Paul Scerri Yang (Correct)
No context found.
Johanna Bryson. Hierarchy and sequence vs. full parallelism in action selection. In Intelligent Virtual Agents 2, pages 113--125, 1999.
Decentralized Allocation of Tasks with Delayed Commencement - Boucke, Weyns, Holvoet.. (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
J. Bryson. Hierarchy and sequence vs. full parallelism in action selection. The Sixth Int. Conf. on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (SAB2000.
Coordinating Very Large Groups Of Wide Area Search.. - Scerri, Liao, Lai.. (Correct)
No context found.
Johanna Bryson. Hierarchy and sequence vs. full parallelism in action selection. In Intelligent Virtual Agents 2, pages 113--125, 1999.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC