| V. Arvind and J. Kobler. Graph isomorphism is low for ZPP NP and other lowness results. Technical Report TR99033, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, 1999. |
....section, it will be helpful to present a technical definition. We begin by recalling the definition of ###P poly#. Definition 26 [5] ###P poly# is the class of languages having an interactive proof system where the strategy of the prover can be computed by a polynomial sized circuit (also see [4] where the multiple prover class MIP#P poly# is observed to be the same as ###P poly#) Clearly ###P poly# # MA # P poly (because Merlin can guess the circuit that implements the Prover s strategy and send send it to Arthur) it appears to be a proper subclass of MA (since otherwise NP # P poly) ....
V. Arvind and J. Kobler. Graph isomorphism is low for ZPP NP and other lowness results. Technical Report TR99033, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, 1999.
....attention. Arvind and K obler [AK97] and Goldreich and Zuckerman [GZ97] proved that MA is contained in ZPP NP . K obler and Watanabe [KW95] and Bshouty et al. BCGKT95] proved that the polynomialtime hierarchy is in ZPP NP , if NP has polynomial size circuits. More recently Arvind and K obler [AK00] proved that AM co AM is low for ZPP NP , i.e. ZPP NP AM co AM ZPP NP . We note that this containment is a signi cant improvement over the na ve bound. We consider a generalization of the class AM co AM. Let E k be BP k BP k . We prove NP E1 ZPP NP using the ....
....coincides with the classes we obtained by operators; namely, we can prove the following, given a class of languages C, Proposition 3 AM C = co R NP C = BP NP C . Hence, in particular AM k = BP k 1 . Similarly, given class C, we can de ne the class MA C . Arvind and K obler [AK00] proved a non trivial result about AM co AM. They showed that AM co AM is low for ZPP NP , i.e, ZPP NP AM co AM ZPP NP . Note that a na ve attempt, that just uses the fact AM co AM ZPP NP , yields ZPP NP AM co AM ZPP 2 . Theorem 1 [AK00] For every language L in AM ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
V. Arvind and J. Kobler, Graph isomorphism is low for ZPP NP and other lowness results, STACS 2000.
....attention. Arvind and Kobler [AK97] and Goldreich and Zuckerman [GZ97] proved that MA is contained in ZPP NP . Kobler and Watanabe [KW95] and Bshouty et al. BCGKT95] proved that the polynomialtime hierarchy is in ZPP NP , if NP has polynomial size circuits. More recently Arvind and Kobler [AK00] proved that AM co AM is low for ZPP NP , i.e. ZPP NP AM co AM ZPP NP . We note that this containment is a significant improvement over the naive bound. We consider a generalization of the class AM co AM. Let E k be BP Delta Sigma k BP Delta Pi k . We prove NP E1 ZPP NP ....
....we obtained by operators; namely, we can prove the following, given a class of languages C, Proposition 3 AM C = co R Delta NP C = BP Delta NP C . Hence, in particular AM Sigma k = BP Delta Sigma k 1 . Similarly, given class C, we can define the class MA C . Arvind and Kobler [AK00] proved a non trivial result about AM co AM. They showed that AM co AM is low for ZPP NP , i.e, ZPP NP AM co AM ZPP NP . Note that a naive attempt, that just uses the fact AM co AM ZPP NP , yields ZPP NP AM co AM ZPP Sigma 2 . Theorem 1 [AK00] For every language L in AM ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
V. Arvind and J. Kobler, Graph isomorphism is low for ZPP NP and other lowness results, STACS 2000.
No context found.
V. Arvind and J. Kobler, Graph isomorphism is low for ZPP NP and other lowness results, STACS 2000.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC