L. E. Parker. Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics. In Distributed Autonomous Robotic System 4, pages 3--12. Springer, Tokyo, Japan, 2000.  Home/Search   Document Details and Download   Summary   Related Articles   Check

.... robots, and application to tasks such as exploration [1] surveillance [3] search and rescue [7] mapping of unknown or partially known environments [6] distributed manipulation [9] and transportation of large objects [16] An excellent review of contemporary work in this area is presented in [10]. In this paper we consider situations in which there may be no access to any global positioning system and the main sensing modality is vision. Our platform of interest is a nonholonomic car like robot with a single physical sensor an omnidirectional camera. Each robot is capable of autonomous ....

L. E. Parker. Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics. In L. E. Parker, G. Bekey, and J. Barhen, editors, Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, volume 4, pages 3--12. Springer, Tokyo, 2000.

....even the simplest of autonomous tasks are impossible. An important subeld within mobile robotics that requires accurate navigation is the performance of collaborative tasks by multiple vehicles. Multiple vehicles can frequently perform tasks more quickly and robustly than a single vehicle [1] [2]. However, accomplishing collaborative tasks demands that each vehicle be aware of relative locations of collaborators in addition to the baseline environmental knowledge. This paper considers the problem of performing concurrent mapping and localization (CML) with a team of cooperating autonomous ....

L. Parker, "Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics," Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems 4, vol. 4, pp. 3--12, 2000.

....methodol ogy could be applied to controlling grasp forces in order to hold and transport objects [7] which is an example of a tightly coupled task. Although Matarid et al. 12] and Kube and Bonabeau [11] have implemented cooperative behaviorbased robotic systems in box pushing tasks, Parker [14] has pointed that carrying an object is considerably more difficult than pushing it, since the carrying task requires the robots to maintain appropriate grasp on the object, while navigating to a given destination in a coordinated fashion. These aspects, together with the need to design ....

....by the other through the object. This action is actually interpreted by FUNCTION as transferring the leadership from one robot to the other. In fact, one could view this form of leadership exchanging as a form of implicit communication, since it occurs as a side effect of the robots actions [14] Assuming that a lead ing robot always moves forward, whenever one of them detects a backward movement, it most certainly mean that the other has resigned the leadership. Conversely, explicit communication can also be used to actually exchange control information via wireless, infrared or even ....

L. E. Parker. Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics. In Proceedings of the Inte'ational Sysmposium on Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, pages 3-12, Knoxville, TN, October 2000.

....[Roumeliotis and Bekey, 2000] one of the first articles to consider distributed and mobile sensor fusion in order to improve the localization of a group of mobile robots. In cooperative robotics there is a large variety of recent articles. Among them, the work of [Cao et al. 1997] and later of [Parker, 2000] are important surveys that describe the main research directions of the area. The research in cooperative robots can vary much depending on the task to be executed by the group of robots. Several works were published with di#erent approaches such as [Sugar and Kumar, 1999] that examines the ....

Parker, L. E. (2000). Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics. In Proceedings of the 4th International Sysmposium on Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems (DARS), pages 3--12, Knoxville, TN.

.... application to tasks such as exploration [1] surveillance [2] search and rescue [3] mapping of unknown or partially known environments [4] 5] distributed manipulation [6] 7] and transportation of large objects [8] 9] An excellent review of contemporary work in this area is presented in [10]. While robot control is considered to be a well understood problem area [11] most of the current success stories in multirobot coordination do not rely on or build on the results available in the control theory and dynamical systems literature. The reason for this is fairly clear. Traditional ....

....it is relatively easy to design reactive controllers or behaviors that react to simple stimuli or commands from the environment. We can see successful applications of this idea in the subsumption architecture [15] in the paradigm for behavior based robotics [16] 17] 18] and in other work [10]. In this paper we address the development of intelligent robot systems by composing simple building blocks in a bottom up approach. The building blocks consist of controllers and estimators, and the framework for composition allows for tightlycoupled perception action loops. While this philosophy ....

L. E. Parker, "Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics," in Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, L. E. Parker, G. Bekey, and J. Barhen, Eds., vol. 4, pp. 3--12. Springer, Tokyo, 2000.

....the variations for high enough n cancels out. Again, by exploiting the physical nature of the communication medium we get rid of the model and avoid some error prone and expensive calculations. Which is important since Parker in her recent review on path planning in multi robot systems writes[11]: One of the most limiting characteristics of much of the existing path planning work is the computational complexity of the approaches. 8 Using Situated Communication in Distributed Autonomous Mobile Robotics Also by having the path plan not in the robot but in the environment we can achieve ....

L.E. Parker. Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics. In Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on distributed autonomous robotic systems, 2000.

....localization and control algorithms and present experimental results that illustrate the implementation and the performance of these algorithms. 1 Introduction It has long been recognized that there are several tasks that can be performed more efficiently and robustly using multiple robots [1]. We are motivated by applications in which robots can be coordinated to develop threedimensional maps of unknown or partially known environments [2, 3] and tasks where robots can cooperate to manipulate and transport objects without using special purpose effectors or material handling ....

L. E. Parker, "Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics," in Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, L. E. Parker, G. Bekey, and J. Barhen, Eds., vol. 4, pp. 3--12. Springer, Tokio, 2000.

....results, with conclusions offered in Section 6. Research performed while visiting Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Related Work The task of pattern formation and formation marching has gained a lot of attention in the last years, and is one of the challenging issues in multi robot research [10]. In [2] a real implementation on a team of outdoor robots is dis cussed. A class of reactive behaviors that implement formations is introduced and tested on a team of military unmanned ground vehicles performing in an outdoor terrain. While this work is similar to ours in terms of the behavior ....

L.E. Parker. "Current State of the Art in Distributed Autonomous Mobile Robots". In L.E. Parker, G. Bekey, J. Barhen (Eds.), Distributed Autonomous Robotics Systems , pp. 3-12, Springer, 2000.

No context found.

L. E. Parker. Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics. In Distributed Autonomous Robotic System 4, pages 3--12. Springer, Tokyo, Japan, 2000.

No context found.

L. Parker, Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robots, in: L. Parker, G. Bekey, J.Barhen (Eds.), Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems 4, Springer, 2000, pp. 3--12.

No context found.

L. E. Parker. Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics. In Distributed Autonomous Robotic System 4, pages 3--12. Springer, Tokyo, Japan, 2000.

No context found.

Parker, L. E.: Current State of the Art in Distributed Autonomous Mobile Robots. In L. E. Parker, G. Beker, J. Barhen (Eds.), Distributed Autonomous Robotics Systems 4, pp.3-12, Springer, 2000

No context found.

L. E. Parker, "Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics," in Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, L. E. Parker, G. Bekey, and J. Barhen, Eds. Tokyo, Japan: Springer-Verlag, 2000, vol. 4, pp. 3--12.

No context found.

L. E. Parker, "Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics," Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, vol. 49, pp. 3--12, 2000.

No context found.

L. E. Parker, "Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics," Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, vol. 49, pp. 3--12, 2000.

No context found.

Parker, L. E.: Current State of the Art in Distributed Autonomous Mobile Robots. In L. E. Parker, G. Beker, J. Barhen (Eds.), Distributed Autonomous Robotics Systems 4, pp.3-12, Springer, 2000

No context found.

L. E. Parker, "Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics," in Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, L. E. Parker, G. Bekey, and J. Barhen, Eds., vol. 4, pp. 3--12. Springer, Tokyo, 2000.

No context found.

Parker, L. E. 2000. Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robotics. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, pp. 3-12.

No context found.

L. E. Parker, "Current State of the Art in Distributed Autonomous Mobile Robotics", in Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems 4, L. E. Parker, G. Bekey, and J. Barhen eds., Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2000, pp. 3-12.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC