| M.Philippsen and M.Zenger. Javaparty-transparant remote objects in java. Concurrency: Practice and Experience, Vol. 9(No.11):1125-1242, 1997. http://wwwipd.ira.uka.de/~phlipp/party.ps.gz. |
....different networks. The system uses a native Java compiler rather than an interpreter or Just In Time (JIT) compiler. Manta provides some Java extensions (see section 3. 2) to build parallel programs with a highly efficient, easy to use communication mechanism almost identical to the JavaParty model[9]. But still, Manta complies with the Java RMI model[3] Our goal is to gain experience with parallel programming using Sun s Java system and the Manta system, and to look at the usability of both systems. The usability of each system is determined by looking at its performance and its ease of use ....
....converts (serializes) the data objects into an array of bytes. Serialization produces a deep copy. Then, when the data is received, it is automatically deserialized by Java s runtime system. 3. 2 Manta s RMI system Manta supports both the standard Java RMI programming model and the JavaParty [9] model. For our Manta applications we have used the JavaParty [9] model. With this model, Manta does not require interfaces such as java.rmi.Remote to declare an object to be remote. As in the JavaParty[9] system, it uses the keyword remote , a Java language extension. When a class is tagged with ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
M.Philippsen and M.Zenger. Javaparty-transparant remote objects in java. Concurrency: Practice and Experience, Vol. 9(No.11):1125-1242, 1997. http://wwwipd.ira.uka.de/~phlipp/party.ps.gz.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC