| M. Collins. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference, 2000. |
....conversely, interpretive failure at a higher level leaves intact the propositions extracted from lower levels. The choice of Treebank corpora as a basis for our initial knowledge extraction work is a natural one, since there exist robust, fairly accurate parsers trained on Treebank corpora (e.g. [7, 10, 9]) and these would eventually allow us to bootstrap our approach to very large unannotated corpora. The major challenge was that of providing reasonably reliable interpretive rules, at least for many of the clausal and other phrasal units that we viewed as potential sources of general ....
M. J. Collins. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML-2000.
....demonstrate a method for fast, exact inference usable in parsing. Given the impracticality of exact inference for standard parsers, a common strategy is to take a PCFG backbone, extract a set of top parses, either the top k or all parses within a score threshold of the top parse, and rerank them [3, 17]. This pruning is done for efficiency; the question is whether it is hurting accuracy. That is, would exact inference be preferable Figure 5 shows the result of parsing with our combined model, using the best model pair, but with the A estimates altered to block parses whose PCFG projection had ....
M. Collins. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. ICML 17, pp. 175--182, 2000.
....Keywords Predicate argument structure, semantic annotation, verb classes. 1. INTRODUCTION Recent years have seen major breakthroughs in natural language processing technology based on the development of powerful new techniques that combine statistical methods and linguistic representations [1,2,3,11]. A critical element that is still lacking, however, is detailed predicate argument structure. In the same way that the existence of the Penn TreeBank [8,9] enabled the development of extremely powerful new syntactic analyzers, moving to the stage of accurate predicate argument analysis will ....
Michael Collins. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2000.
No context found.
Collins, M. (2000). Discriminative Reranking for Natural Language Parsing. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
No context found.
M. Collins. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference, 2000.
No context found.
Michael Collins. 2000. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference (ICML 2000), pages 175--182, Stanford, California.
No context found.
M. Collins. 2000. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. Proc. ICML, pp. 175-182.
No context found.
Collins, M.J. 2000. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In The Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning.
No context found.
Collins, M.: Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In: Proc. ICML. (2000) 175--182
No context found.
Collins, M. 2000. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Machine Learning: Proc. of the 17th Intl. Conference (ICML 2000), 175--182.
No context found.
Michael Collins. 2000. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Machine Learning: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference (ICML 2000), pages 175--182, Stanford, California.
No context found.
Michael Collins. 2000. Discriminative Reranking for Natural Language Parsing. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Machine Learning, Stanford, CA.
No context found.
Collins, M., & Koo, T. (2005). Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. Computational Linguistics, 31(1), 25--69.
No context found.
Collins, M. (2000). Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Proc. Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 175-- 182. Morgan Kaufmann.
No context found.
Michael Collins. 2000. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Proc. 17th International Conf. on Machine Learning, pages 175--182. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
No context found.
Collins, Michael. (2000). Discriminative Reranking for Natural Language Parsing. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2000).
No context found.
Michael Collins. 2000. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Proceedings of ICML 2000.
No context found.
Michael Collins. 2000. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning 2000.
No context found.
Michael Collins. 2000. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Proceedings of ICML-2000. Daniel Gildea and Daniel Jurafsky. 2002. Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 28(3):245--288.
No context found.
M. Collins. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. ICML 17, pp. 175--182, 2000.
No context found.
Michael Collins. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Proc. 17th International Conf. on Machine Learning, pages 175--182. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2000.
No context found.
M. Collins. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Proceedings 17th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 175-182. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2000.
No context found.
COLLINS, M. J. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2000) . 2000.
No context found.
Collins, M.: Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In: ICML 2000. (2000)
No context found.
Michael Collins. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2000. (to appear).
First 50 documents
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC