H. Horacek. Presenting Proofs in a Human-Oriented Way. Proc. of CADE-16, H. Ganzinger (ed.), pp. 142-156, number 1632 in LNAI. Springer, 1999. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
System Description: TRAMP - Transformation of Machine-Found Proofs .. - Meier (2000) (3 citations) (Correct)
....2 : S 1 S 2 , 8x: x 2 S 1 ) x 2 S 2 ) from the premises c 2 F and F G. A corresponding basic ND proof consists of a whole sequence of basic ND steps. Other work indicates that assertion level proofs are well suited as basic representation level for further human oriented proof presentation [7]. In the following we describe the Tramp system which can transform the output of several ATPs for rst order logic with equality into ND proofs at the assertion level. Moreover, we give an example of an assertion level proof produced by Tramp and discuss current applications of Tramp and ....
H. Horacek. Presenting proofs in a human-oriented way. In Proc. of CADE-16, pages 142-156, 1999.
Representation of Mathematical Concepts - For Inferencing And (2004) Self-citation (Horacek) (Correct)
No context found.
H. Horacek. Presenting Proofs in a Human-Oriented Way. Proc. of CADE-16, H. Ganzinger (ed.), pp. 142-156, number 1632 in LNAI. Springer, 1999.
Dialog Issues for a Tutor System Incorporating Expert Problem.. - Melis, Horacek (2000) Self-citation (Horacek) (Correct)
....the underlying situation. Therefore, we have facilities that can reorganize inference structures, especially in varying degrees of explicitness motivated by psychological insights (JohnsonLaird Byrne 1990) The method is applicable to general discourse and elaborated for mathematical proofs (Horacek 1999), where the decisions about leaving information implicit or not are based on the given environment and assumptions about the user. Consider, as an example for an interactive system, the proof planner of Omega mega. Its functionality has been described in section . This functionality can be used ....
Horacek, H. 1999. Presenting proofs in a humanoriented way. In Ganzinger, H., ed., Automated Deduction -- CADE-16, volume 1632 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 142--156. Springer.
Hierarchical Contextual Reasoning - Autexier (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
Horacek, Helmut. (1999). Presenting proofs in a human-oriented way. In Ganzinger, H., (ed.), Proceedings of the 16 Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE), LNAI 1632, pages 142--156, Trento, Italy. Springer.
[] or SUCCESS is Not Enough: Current Technology and Future.. - Schumann, Robinson (2001) (Correct)
No context found.
H. Horacek. Presenting proofs in a human-oriented way. In H. Ganzinger, editor, Automated Deduction --- CADE--16, volume 1632 of LNAI, pages 142--156. Springer Verlag, 1999.
[] or SUCCESS is Not Enough: Current Technology and Future.. - Schumann, Robinson (Correct)
No context found.
H. Horacek. Presenting proofs in a human-oriented way. In H. Ganzinger, editor, Automated Deduction | CADE{16, volume 1632 of LNAI, pages 142-156. Springer Verlag, 1999.
Towards a Semantic Web for Formal Mathematics - Schena (2002) (Correct)
No context found.
Horacek H. Presenting Proofs in a Human Oriented Way. In 16th International Conference on Automated Deduction, 1999.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC