Citations: Generative Morphology - Scalise (ResearchIndex)

13 citations found. Retrieving documents...

S. Scalise. Generative Morphology. Foris, Dordrecht, 1984.

Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check

This paper is cited in the following contexts:

NLP for Term Variant Extraction: Synergy between.. - Jacquemin, Tzoukermann (1999) (15 citations) (Correct)

....morphology. We will briefly examine how these cases are handled for English and for French, and how these approaches influenced our computational model for French. 4.3.1. Precedence Rules Ordering Hypothesis in English In generative morphology of English (Marchand, 1969; Aronoff, 1976; Scalise, 1986), affixes are classified into affixes and #affixes, i.e. Class I and Class II. The Ordering Hypothesis, which consists of giving some affixes precedence over others, is as follows: 1. Class I affixation 2. Cyclic phonological rules 3. Class II affixation In Table 4, inspired by (Scalise, ....

....Scalise, 1986) affixes are classified into affixes and #affixes, i.e. Class I and Class II. The Ordering Hypothesis, which consists of giving some affixes precedence over others, is as follows: 1. Class I affixation 2. Cyclic phonological rules 3. Class II affixation In Table 4, inspired by (Scalise, 1986), the category of affixes applies first, then phonological rules, then #affixation, and no phonological rule can apply anymore. According to the Ordering Hypothesis, comfortable is no longer available to the in prefixation rule. 24 CHRISTIAN JACQUEMIN AND EVELYNE TZOUKERMANN TABLE 4. Affix ....

Scalise, S. (1986) Generative Morphology. Foris, Second Edition.

The Use Of Linguistic Hierarchies In Speech Understanding - Seneff (1998) (7 citations) (Correct)

....level units such as clauses. Linguists have done much to describe the syntactic structure of speech [19] and have attempted to address the issues of how syntax and semantics might interact [16] Studies of the structures of words in multiple languages have revealed a great deal of substructure [31]. The exact specification of that substructure still eludes us, however, particularly for languages such as English with a rich borrowing from other languages. We are now reasonably confident that the syllable exists as an intermediate layer between words and phonemes, al 1 This material is ....

S. Scalise, Generative Morphology, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1986.

Satisfying Constraints on Extraction and Adjunction - Bouma, Malouf, Sag (1997) (9 citations) (Correct)

....XP Rest modifier XP NP X V become Voice(active) Such profligate structures and derivations introduce considerable unwanted complexity into the grammar of German. Nonetheless, it is plain that von Stechow s and Dowty s data present an interesting challenge to the principle of strong lexicalism (see Scalise (1984, 101#) that we believe is both desirable and possible to maintain. Dutch Finally, we include here the ambiguity of adverbial scope in the Dutch verb cluster. 39) dat that Arie Arie Bob Bob de vrouwen the women met een telescoop with a telescope zag saw bekijken. look at. that Arie ....

Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.

The Expression Of Modality In Korean - Wymann (1996) (Correct)

.... to lexeme based in Aronoff (1994) I will refrain from giving a synopsis of the entire framework and only discuss the points relevant to this study as they are applied in the course of the analysis the basics of first and newer generation generative morphology are well summed up in e.g. Scalise (1984), Spencer (1991) and Katamba (1993) ## signal the external boundaries of a lexical category, signals a morpheme boundary, bracketing marks bound morphemes which may be either derivational suffixes (which may change the syntactic category of their base) or inflectional morphemes (which do not ....

....1958, 123) establishing that the minimal sign for syntax, i.e. the word (Chomsky (1970) is also the minimal sign for morphology. 22 I do not consider inflectional morphology to be posited in the lexicon this position, commonly referred to as the Strong Lexicalist Hypothesis (cf. e.g. Scalise (1984)) is taken up again by Chomsky in his more recent work 88 must be assigned, i.e. nodes 1 3 need not have an overtly assigned suffix to form a grammatical construction. It will be remembered that there are a number of speech levels which do indeed only take an SCSfx, such as e.g. the DFS or the ....

Scalise, Sergio (1984) Generative morphology. Foris, Dordrecht.

French Clitic Movement Without Clitics Or Movement - Miller, Sag (1995) (35 citations) (Correct)

....head. 5) WEIGHT values (e.g. lite vs. non lite) are relevant to the account of French linear order phenomena developed by Abeille and Godard (in press) FRENCH CLITIC MOVEMENT WITHOUT CLITICS OR MOVEMENT 9 HPSG is a lexicalist theory, incorporating the principle of Strong Lexicalism (see Scalise (1984: 101ff) 8 That is, 1) the principles of word structure are independent from those governing syntactic structure and (2) syntactic operations do not affect (or even see ) the internal structure of words. Strong lexicalism precludes any analysis where lexical affixes are assigned lexemic ....

Scalise, Sergio: 1984, Generative Morphology, Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

The Proper Treatment of Events - van Lambalgen, Hamm (2004) (1 citation) (Correct)