Marcelo Tallis, Jihie Kim, and Yolanda Gil. User studies of knowledge acquisition tools: Methodology and lessons learned. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, 1999.  Home/Search   Document Details and Download   Summary   Related Articles   Check

.... [13, 15] Eriksson pointed out the need for tools that would allow e#cient knowledge acquisition, and described a system for building such tools [6] Tallis et al. developed a library of scripts for modifying knowledge bases, which helped to enforce the consistency of the modified knowledge [7, 27, 28, 29]. Kim and Gil considered the use of scripts for building new knowledge acquisition tools, and created a system for evaluating these tools [9, 10] Blythe et al. designed a general knowledge acquisition interface based on previous techniques [2] Musen developed the prot eg e environment for ....

Marcelo Tallis, Jihie Kim, and Yolanda Gil. User studies of knowledge acquisition tools: Methodology and lessons learned. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, 1999.

.... What can a computer do can, using the sentence s parsing, be transformed into A computer can do what , then nding an answer in the form A computer can help you check your email . 5. 3 Evaluation A recent discussion of methodology for evaluating knowledge acquisition can be found in [48]. Other work that serves as an inspiration performed quantitative studies of usefulness of prior knowledge for knowledge acquisition; it includes [9, 18] Our evaluation of the knowledge acquired will focus on measuring improvements in the performance application, as is detailed in the following ....

M. Tallis, J. Kim, and Y. Gil. User studies of knowledge acquisition tools: Methodology and lessons learned. In Proceedings of KAW'99, 1999.

....also be subject to evaluation, and this is the topic we begin to address in this paper. KBS researchers have studied the problems of assessing knowledge reuse, the effectiveness of KA tools, and the adequacy of acquired knowledge. Quantitative studies are relatively rare, the exceptions include [2, 10, 4], and the norm is a report of the qualitative benefit of e.g. the use of an existing ontology, or the use of a KA tool. The applicability of software engineering (SE) approaches to KBS evaluation has been noted previously [7] and such techniques been successfully applied [5, 9] This paper ....

Tallis, M., Kim, J., and Gil, Y. User Studies of Knowledge Acquisition Tools: Methodology and Lessons Learned. Proceedings of KAW'99 http://sern.ucalgary.ca/KSI/KAW/KAW99/papers.html

....funding bodies and commerce for measurable costs and benefits of knowledge technologies. KBS researchers have studied the problems of assessing knowledge reuse, the effectiveness of KA tools, and the adequacy of acquired knowledge. Quantitative studies are relatively rare, the exceptions include [2, 8, 3], and the norm is a report of the qualitative benefit of e.g. the use of an existing ontology, or the use of a KA tool. The applicability of software engineering (SE) approaches to KBS evaluation has been noted previously [6] and such techniques been successfully applied [4, 7] This paper ....

Tallis, M., Kim, J., and Gil, Y. User Studies of Knowledge Acquisition Tools: Methodology and Lessons Learned. Proceedings of KAW'99 http://sern.ucalgary.ca/KSI/KAW/KAW99/papers.html

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC