Bobrow,D.G. & Norman,D.A., 1975, Some principles of memory schemata, In Bobrow & Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding, New York: Academic Press.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....of differences of language usage regularities. E(z ) can therefore be identified following (16) and (20) with (3) the conceptual meaning. M(x ) of a term x which is a fuzzy subset in U 2(zi,x ) M(x ) c U (21) We are now in the position to assign to the fuzzy relation L : T X U [0,1] (22) and the two sided correspondence (3) and (4) induced by it, the following operations. The two distance measures (14) and (18) operating an numerical data obSained from the correlational analysis (11) of lexical items employed in a corpus of natural language texts, will determine the ....

BOBROW,D.G./NORMAN,D.A.:"Some Principles of Memory Schemata" in: Bobrow/ Collins (Eds): Representation and Understanding, New York 1975,131-149

....step in achieving the reconciliation between the semantic and schematic perspectives. The two perspectives of the semantics of an object, viz. the meaning and use of an object are identified. We take cues from fields like linguistics, cognitive psychology, AI, Databases and programming languages [Woo85, BW85, SSR92, Tho89, BN75, MC91] and explore research in these areas based on these two perspectives. This helps us provide a rationale for context being the pivot of the semantic proximity between two objects. The computational benefits of a context representation in a multidatabase system are also discussed. Here we draw ....

....the behavior of an abstract processor that executes programs written in that language and is referred to as operational semantics. The view suggested in AI is that one memory schema refers to another only through the use of a description which is dependent on the context of the original reference [BN75]. In the area of linguistics and cognitive psychology, experiments have borne a strong relationship between semantic and contextual similarity [MC91] This has led to the belief that semantic similarity is a function of the contexts in which an object is used and that the contextual representation ....

D. Bobrow and D. Norman. Some principles of Memory Schemata. In Representation and Understanding. New York : Academic Press, 1975.

....determines the applicable meaning descriptor assumption. The query context defined in Section 3.3.2 reflects this perspective. One view suggested in AI is that one memory schema refers to another only through the use of a description which is dependent on the context of the original reference [BN75] In the area of linguistics and cognitive psychology, experiments have borne out a strong relationship between semantic similarity and contextual similarity [MC91] This has led to the belief that semantic similarity is a function of the contexts in which an object is used and that the ....

D. Bobrow and D. Norman. Some principles of Memory Schemata. In Representation and Understanding. New York : Academic Press, 1975.

....determines the applicable meaning descriptor assumption. The query context defined in Section 3.3.2 reflects this perspective. One view suggested in AI is that one memory schema refers to another only through the use of a description which is dependent on the context of the original reference [3]. In the area of linguistics and cognitive psychology, experiments have borne out a strong relationship between semantic similarity and contextual similarity [14] This has led to the belief that semantic similarity is a function of the contexts in which an object is used and that the contextual ....

D. Bobrow and D. Norman. Some principles of Memory Schemata. In Representation and Understanding. New York : Academic Press, 1975.

....is reflected in the great variety of notional pairings which different disciplines have produced facing a similar, if not identical research problem. Thus, their notions of formal vs. experiental knowledge [2] semantic vs. episodic memory [21] frame vs. scene [3] description vs. schema [1], etc. show a striking resemblance: although their approaches differ in what they consider natural language meaning to be, they nonetheless converge on the central notion of it, being a relation between a representation (i.e. the body of discourse) and that which it represents (i.e. a ....

BOBROW, D.G./NORMAN, D.A.: "Some Principles of Memory Schemata" in: Bobrow/Collins (Eds): Representation and Understanding, New York 1975, 131--149

No context found.

Bobrow,D.G. & Norman,D.A., 1975, Some principles of memory schemata, In Bobrow & Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding, New York: Academic Press.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC