C. Miller. Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View. Proc. IEEE LCN'97, pages 369--378, Nov. 1997.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....a NACK, which consists of a bitmap of the block. The file is sent initially in its entirety in the first pass. The repairs are sent in the second pass. This is repeated until all repairs are received by all receivers. MFTP is designed for a very reliable channel where the BER is better than 10 [12], resulting in 70 of the receivers receiv Fig. 4 Number of corrupted copies of a multicast packet, 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Number of Users Without OBP With OBP Number of Corrupted Packet Copies 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Window Size (Mbytes) Delay Link ....

C. K. Miller, "Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View," Local Computer Networks, 1997.

....that the server can handle the requests, the retransmitted packets are often of use only to a small subset of the clients. More sophisticated solutions that address these limitations by using techniques such as local repair, polling, or the use of a hierarchy have been proposed [5] 10] 15] [16], but these solutions as yet appear inadequate [19] Moreover, whereas adaptive retransmission based solutions are at best unscalable and inefficient on terrestrial networks, they are unworkable on satellite networks, where the back channel typically has high latency and UC Berkeley and ....

....[20] defines a hybrid approach to reliable multicast, coupling requests for retransmission with transmission of redundant codewords, and quantifies the benefits of this approach in practice. Their work, and the work of many other authors, focus on erasure codes based on Reed Solomon codes [7] [16], 17] 18] 22] 23] 24] The limitation of these codes is that encoding and decoding times are slow on large block sizes, effectively limiting # to small values for practical applications. Hence, their solution involves breaking the source data into small blocks of packets and encoding over ....

C. K. Miller, "Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View." In Proc. of the 22nd Annual Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN '97), 1997.

....out to explore how to support multicast in various networking environments. Especially, these include systems that use multicast to deliver data and multimedia traffic [1] 2] 3] Other systems support reliable and unreliable multicast over LANs [4] 5] 6] Internet [7] 8] 9] 10] 11] 12] [13] [14] 15] ATM [16] 17] and networks including mobile hosts [18] 19] 20] 21] 22] Multicast flow control is essential for high performance multicast applications. Mishra and Wu [23] studied several techniques of flow control for atomic multicast protocols by simulations. Wang and Schwartz ....

....packet level adjustment, our flow control scheme only supports session level adaptation. The problem of reliable distribution of bulk data to many receivers was studied extensively. Proposed solutions included those that use techniques such as local repair, polling or hierarchy [14] 10] 25] [13] [11] Additionally, the data carousel approach [51] was proposed to eliminate retransmission and to ensure full reliability at the expense of high overhead. Furthermore, forward error correction based on erasure codes was proposed to achieve reliable multicast [44] 45] 13] 46] 47] 49] 50] ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

C. Kenneth Miller, "Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View", IEEE Local Computer Network, 1997

....Even in the event that the server can handle the requests, the retransmitted packets are often of use only to a small subset of the clients. More sophisticated solutions which address these limitations by using techniques such as local repair, polling, or the use of a hierarchy have been proposed [3, 7, 10, 11, 21], but these solutions as yet appear inadequate. Moreover, whereas retransmission based solutions are at best unscalable and inefficient on terrestrial networks, they are unworkable on satellite networks, where the back channel typically has high latency and limited capacity, if it is available at ....

....Towsley [14] defines a hybrid approach to reliable multicast, coupling requests for retransmission with transmission of redundant codewords, and quantifies the benefits of this approach in practice. Their work, and the work of many other authors, focus on erasure codes based on Reed Solomon codes [5, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18]. The limitation of these codes is that encoding and decoding times are slow, effectively limiting k to small values for practical applications. Hence, their solution involves breaking the source data into smaller blocks of packets and encoding over these blocks. Receivers which have not received ....

C. K. Miller, "Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View." In Proc. of the 22nd Annual Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN '97), 1997.

....Even in the event that the server can handle the requests, the retransmitted packets are often of use only to a small subset of the clients. More sophisticated solutions which address these limitations by using techniques such as local repair, polling, or the use of a hierarchy have been proposed [5, 10, 15, 16, 27], but these solutions as yet appear inadequate (see for example [19] Moreover, whereas adaptive retransmission based solutions are at best unscalable and inefficient on terrestrial networks, they are unworkable on satellite networks, where the back channel typically has high latency and limited ....

....Towsley [20] defines a hybrid approach to reliable multicast, coupling requests for retransmission with transmission of redundant codewords, and quantifies the benefits of this approach in practice. Their work, and the work of many other authors, focus on erasure codes based on Reed Solomon codes [7, 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, 24]. The limitation of these codes is that encoding and decoding times are slow, effectively limiting k to small values for practical applications. Hence, their solution involves breaking the source data into smaller blocks of packets and encoding over these blocks. Receivers which fail to receive a ....

C. K. Miller, "Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View." In Proc. of the 22nd Annual Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN '97), 1997.

....Even in the event that the server can handle the requests, the retransmitted packets are often of use only to a small subset of the clients. More sophisticated solutions that address these limitations by using techniques such as local repair, polling, or the use of a hierarchy have been proposed [5, 10, 15, 16, 27], but these solutions as yet appear inadequate [19] Moreover, whereas adaptive retransmissionbased solutions are at best unscalable and inefficient on terrestrial networks, they are unworkable on satellite networks, where the back channel typically has high latency and limited capacity, if it is ....

....networking community. However, FEC often refers to codes that detect and correct errors, and these codes are typically implemented in special purpose hardware. To avoid confusion, we always refer to the codes we consider as erasure codes. thors, focus on erasure codes based on Reed Solomon codes [7, 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, 24]. The limitation of these codes is that encoding and decoding times are slow on large block sizes, effectively limiting k to small values for practical applications. Hence, their solution involves breaking the source data into small blocks of packets and encoding over these blocks. Receivers that ....

C. K. Miller, "Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View." In Proc. of the 22nd Annual Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN '97), 1997.

....Even in the event that the server can handle the requests, the retransmitted packets are often of use only to a small subset of the clients. More sophisticated solutions which address these limitations by using techniques such as local repair, polling, or the use of a hierarchy have been proposed [3, 7, 10, 11, 21], but these solutions as yet appear inadequate. Moreover, whereas retransmission based solutions are at best unscalable and inefficient on terrestrial networks, they are unworkable on satellite networks, where the back channel typically has high latency and limited capacity, if it is available at ....

....Towsley [14] defines a hybrid approach to reliable multicast, coupling requests for retransmission with transmission of redundant codewords, and quantifies the benefits of this approach in practice. Their work, and the work of many other authors, focus on erasure codes based on Reed Solomon codes [5, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18]. The limitation of these codes is that encoding and decoding times are slow, effectively limiting k to small values for practical applications. Hence, their solution involves breaking the source data into smaller blocks of packets and encoding over these blocks. Receivers which have not received ....

C. K. Miller, "Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View." In Proc. of the 22nd Annual Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN '97), 1997.

No context found.

C. Miller. Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View. Proc. IEEE LCN'97, pages 369--378, Nov. 1997.

No context found.

C. Miller. Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View. Proc. IEEE LCN'97, pages 369--378, Nov. 1997.

No context found.

C. K. Miller, "Reliable multicast protocols: A practical view," IEEE Local Computer Network, 1997.

No context found.

C. K. Miller. Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View. Proceedings of 22nd Annual Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN '97), 1997.

No context found.

C. K. Miller, "Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View." In Proc. of the 22nd Annual Conference on Local Computer Networks, 1997.

No context found.

C. K. Miller, "Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View." In Proc. of the 22nd Annual Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN '97), 1997.

No context found.

C. K. Miller, "Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View." In Proc. of the 22nd Annual Conference on Local Computer Networks, 1997.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC