| Gupta, G. and McCabe, A. (1997). A Review of Dynamic Handwritten Signature Verification. Computer Science Department, James Cook University. |
....identification, it remains one of the most widely acceptable means of personal identification. It is also non intrusive, inexpensive and one of the most commonly used personal identification systems. A number of reasonably reliable online signature verification systems exist, see for example [9, 2]. These systems find particular applications, for instance to verify the identity of a purchase card, including credit card, holder. In this case the person will be required to sign on an electronic device, typically a digitizing tablet. The test signature is verified by comparing it with a ....
....is reported in paper [8] and a EER of 3 in paper [7] However, it should be noted that these results were obtained using only casual forgeries in the test test. In addition a very small database was used. Since the results tend to deteriorate when the size of the database is increased (see e.g. [9]) the figures quoted above should be used with caution. In the next section we describe our database in some detail, before we give a brief outline of our algorithm. 1 2 Database Our database consists of the signatures of twenty three individuals, all students of roughly the same age. For ....
Gupta, J and McCabe, A. A Review of Dynamic Handwritten Signature Verification. James Cook University, Australia (1997).
No context found.
Gupta, G. and McCabe, A. (1997). A Review of Dynamic Handwritten Signature Verification. Computer Science Department, James Cook University.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC