Pinker, S., Words and Rules.London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson (1999)  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....speakers. This subsection uses English, as an example, for a discussion of some of the complexities of a human language. For a detailed discussion of English word formation see Bauer [14] or Selkirk [240] Bauer [15] discusses international varieties of English, as used by native speakers. Pinker [218] provides a readable discussion of word rules, taking as his subject regular and irregular verbs. Many of the points covered in the following subsections will be familiar to those developers speaking English as a native language (although in some cases this knowledge will be implicit ) The ....

Steven Pinker. Words and Rules. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1999.

....linguists and cognitive scientists, notably Ray Jackendo , David Pesetsky, and Steven Pinker. Certainly there are innumerable others whose work I have used, but whose ideas have been more integrated into the canon. In particular, I have used the division of labor in morphology suggested by [4] and [7], the head movement mechanism (with some modi cation) given by [6] the two levels of syntactic structure (again with some modi cation) given by [5] and the mechanism for specifying meanings given in [2] and used throughout his later work. I have also used the modi cations to standard theory ....

Steven Pinker. Words and Rules. Basic Books, 1999.

.... skills, in terms of a modular view of the language faculty in which the knowledge of language is assumed to consist of two separate components, a lexicon of stored entries and a computational system of combinatorial operations to form larger linguistic expressions (e.g. Chomsky 1995, Pinker 1999). They argued that in WS, these two core modules of language are dissociated such that the computational (rule based) system for language is selectively spared, while lexical representations and or their access procedures are impaired. Recently, however, this account of WS has been challenged, ....

....the semantic system or their activation via fast sloppy access. This account also fits in with the proposed interpretation of the results on inflectional morphology in children with WS. If to access the irregular past form a blocking operation inhibiting the regularly inflected form is required (Pinker 1999), the children with WS may have a lexical system where access is too fast with insufficient editing of responses. The regular past form may then be processed effectively but also elicited where an irregular past form would be more appropriate. A similar mechanism could operate upon the ....

Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules. London. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

.... Nespor and Vogel (1986) among others, find it necessary to resort to reanalysis rules that have the power to merge sequences of constituents that are larger than clitic groups (phonological phrases, intonational phrases, utterances) into single constituents of the same type. 30 Following Pinker (2000) and Jackendoff (1997) we adopt the view that regular inflected forms such as gloves can be composed online from the lexical entry glove plus a regular affix, and thus need not be stored in the lexicon. By contrast, an irregular inflected form such as feet must be a lexical item. A restriction ....

Pinker, Steven (2000) Words and Rules. Basic Books, New York.

....nature of modules and the question of what theoretical models are appropriate in order to explain behavior and cognition. Consider the cognitivist hypothesis that English speakers produce the past tense of verbs using two distinct modules, one for regular verbs and the other for irregular verbs (Pinker, 1999). There appears to be some empirical evidence that these two modules reside in separate portions of the brain. Patients with lesions in the anterior portion of the brain tend to fail to produce regular past tense forms while their ability to produce irregular past tense forms appears to be ....

Pinker, S. (1999). Words and Rules. The Ingredients of Language. New York, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

....past tense: be, have, do, say, make, go, take, come, see, get . Strikingly, these verbs are also the 10 most frequent verbs in English usage [16] In fact, it is recognised by linguists that irregularity (i.e. non compositionality) correlates closely with frequency in natural language [17]. The frequency with which meanings need to be expressed in the ILM (and hence, indirectly the frequency of use of particular strings) is uniform. In contrast, the frequency of use of words in natural languages approximates a Zip an distribution [18] that is, the frequency of use of a particular ....

S. Pinker, Words and Rules, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1999.

No context found.

Pinker, S., Words and Rules.London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson (1999)

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC