| S. H. Low, N. F. Maxemchuk, and S. Paul. Collusion in a multi-party communication protocol for anonymous credit cards. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 1994. Submitted. |
....One reason is the growth of a fast and inexpensive standardized communication infrastructure (EDI, NII, KQML [3] Telescript [5] etc. over which separately designed agents belonging to different organizations can interact in an open environment in real time, and safely carry out transactions [8, 22, 10, 9]. Secondly, there is an industrial trend towards agile enterprises: small, organizational overhead avoiding enterprises that form short term alliances to be able to respond to larger and more diverse orders than they individually could. Such ventures can take advantage of economies of scale when ....
S. H. Low, N. F. Maxemchuk, and S. Paul. Collusion in a multi-party communication protocol for anonymous credit cards. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 1994. Submitted.
....One reason is the growth of a fast and inexpensive standardized communication infrastructure (EDI, NII, KQML [3] Telescript [5] etc. over which separately designed agents belonging to different organizations can interact in an open environment in real time, and safely carry out transactions [8, 22, 10, 9]. Secondly, there is an industrial trend towards agile enterprises: small, organizational overhead avoiding enterprises that form short term alliances to be able to respond to larger and more diverse orders than they individually could. Such ventures can take advantage of economies of scale when ....
S. H. Low, N. F. Maxemchuk, and S. Paul. Collusion in a multi-party communication protocol for anonymous credit cards. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 1994. Submitted.
No context found.
S. Low, N. F. Maxemchuk, S. Paul, "Collusion in a Multi-party Communication Protocol for Anonymous Credit Cards," Submitted to IEEE Trans. on Networking.
No context found.
Steven Low, Nicholas F. Maxemchuk and Sanjoy Paul, "Collusion in a Multi-Party Communication Protocol for Anonymous Credit Cards", submitted for publication.
....F. Maxemchuk AT T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974 DRAFT: March 17, 1994 Abstract Security and privacy protection become increasingly important as we enter the era of electronic commerce and information superhighways. We have applied the same principle of information separation in [7, 6] to design an anonymous mercantile protocol that can be used over the Internet for anonymous funds transfer from a customer to a seller and anonymous information delivery in the reversed direction. The idea is to separate all information needed for a transaction into different components and use ....
....facilities provided by different vendors. A transaction between a customer and a company A may be carried on the facility of a competing company B. It is then to A s interest to hide the identity of the customer from B. The protocol is an extension of the anonymous credit card protocol of [7, 6], tailored to its application on the Internet. While the basic idea of information separation is used in both protocols, there are major differences between the two. These are pointed out in x5 after the protocol description. An alternative to our approach that also provides payment anonymity is ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
S. H. Low, N. F. Maxemchuk, and S. Paul. Collusion in a multiparty communication protocol for anonymous credit cards. Submitted to IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.
....Nicholas F. Maxemchuk AT T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974 February 24, 1994 Abstract Security and privacy protection become increasingly important as we enter the era of electronic commerce and information superhighways. We have applied the same principle of information separation in [7, 6] to design an anonymous mercantile protocol that can be used over the Internet for anonymous funds transfer from a customer to a seller and anonymous information delivery in the reversed direction. The idea is to separate all information needed for a transaction into different components and use ....
....facilities provided by different vendors. A transaction between a customer and a company A may be carried on the facility of a competing company B. It is then to A s interest to hide the identity of the customer from B. The protocol is an extension of the anonymous credit card protocol of [7, 6], tailored to its application on the Internet. While the basic idea of information separation is used in both protocols, there are major differences between the two. These are pointed out in x5 after the protocol description. An alternative to our approach that also provides payment anonymity is ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
S. H. Low, N. F. Maxemchuk, and S. Paul. Collusion in a multiparty communication protocol for anonymous credit cards. Submitted to IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC