Pedersen, E.R., McCall, K., Moran, T. and Halasz, F. Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In Proc. CHI 1993, ACM Press (1993), 391-398.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....recognition [9] Many systems use a pen based sketching interface to encourage creative activities: SILK [14] uses it for GUI design, MusicPad [6] uses it for music composition, SKETCH [22] and Teddy [13] use it for 3D modeling. Pen based techniques are commonly used on electronic board systems [8][19][20] with specialized interfaces designed for large boards. For example, a series of papers on the Tivoli system [15] proposes many interaction techniques to organize handwritten notes in meeting environment. Although this previous work discusses the interaction techniques and specific ....

Prderson,E., McCall,K, Moran,T.P., Halasz,F., Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings, INTERCHI'93, pp,391-399.

....recognition [9] Many systems use a pen based sketching interface to encourage creative activities: SILK [14] uses it for GUI design, MusicPad [6] uses it for music composition, SKETCH [22] and Teddy [13] use it for 3D modeling. Pen based techniques are commonly used on electronic board systems [8][19][20] with specialized interfaces designed for large boards. For example, a series of papers on the Tivoli system [15] proposes many interaction techniques to organize handwritten notes in meeting environment. Although this previous work discusses the interaction techniques and specific ....

Prderson,E., McCall,K., Moran,T.P., Halasz,F., Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings, INTERCHI'93, pp,391-399.

....to question the fundamental designs that society has adopted as representative of a computer. Traditional interaction paradigms, such as the one keyboard one mouse paradigm can be constraining to users and are slowly giving way to more flexible technologies, such as large screen displays [20, 27, 29] and handheld computers [19] Still, these new technologies are not sufficiently addressing the needs of all users, specifically multiple children sharing machines in the classroom [12] Distance learning is currently a major research and industrial focus worldwide while the re design of hardware ....

....people working together around a shared display. Research in Single Display Groupware (SDG) systems [26] have explored the development of co located multi user environments including connecting individual computers to one large, passive display [30] creating large, shared interactive displays [20], and providing multiple peripherals on a shared computer [26] Research on large interactive display systems has been driven primarily by desire for meeting room support [20, 27] Several types of interactive displays have been developed including electronic whiteboards [20] interactive wall ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Pederen, E. McCall, K., Moran, T., & Halasz, F. (1993). Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In Proceedings of InterCHI '93. 391-398.

....to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and or a fee. GROUP 01, Sept. 30 Oct. 3, 2001, Boulder, Colorado, USA. Copyright 2001 ACM 1 58113 294 8 01 0009 . 5.00. Adobe Illustrator. For example, popular whiteboards such as wb[11] Tivoli [37], and the one in Microsoft Netmeeting provide only a limited set of tools, such as pen, line, oval, filled rectangle, and eraser. In collaborative applications those shared whiteboards are used, the simple editing functionality would usually su#ce. Group awareness mechanisms such as telepointer, ....

E. R. Pedersen, K. McCall, T. P. Moran, and F. G. Halasz. Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. In Proceedings of the InterCHI'93 Conference, pages 391--398, Amsterdam, Apr. 1993.

....digital walls have been used for tasks such as tape drawing [2] with specialized interaction techniques In interaction style, our work is most similar to whiteboard interfaces, which have emphasized informal interaction, clean screens, and fluid interactions with stroke based materials. Tivoli [28], using the Liveboard [5] was the first welldeveloped electronic whiteboard system, and we have adopted its basic stroke capture metaphor and concepts for containers (lists, etc. as loosely structured geometrical composites. Tivoli used GUI like controls outside the whiteboard area, multiple ....

....command interaction need to be provided: command activation, item manipulation, and the entry of text and parameters. These are in addition to direct content interactions such as drawing, rotating a model, interacting with an application, etc. Command activation: Whiteboard systems such as Tivoli [28] use gestural marks for commands, along with GUI widgets on some areas of the board. Flatland provides radial menus for command activation, augmented by the use of gestural marks. Others allow the choice of commands to be determined by the physical way in which the stroke is made, such as choice ....

Pedersen, E.R., McCall, K., Moran, T., and Halasz, F. G. Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In Proc. InterCHI '93, pp. 391-398.

....has focused on meetings between co located people. Research efforts in this category involves technological contributions, e.g. the design of meeting rooms (Nunamaker et al. 1991) roomware (Streitz et al. 1997) advanced meeting technologies (Elrod et al. 1992) and software applications (Pedersen et al. 1993), but also empirical contributions, e.g. studies of the ways in which people make meetings happen (Mantei 1989; Moran et al. 1996) Clearly, these contributions have been very important to the field. One issue that has not been so much addressed in the research on meeting support is mobility. In ....

....The research on roomware tends to go beyond the context of the meeting. 1 Research on meeting support also explores advanced hardware technologies, e.g. electronic whiteboards (Elrod et al. 1992) and software applications with which these could be equipped, e.g. the Tivoli application (e.g. Pedersen et al. 1993). Software for meeting support running on light weight technologies like PDAs (Personal Digital Assistant) has been explored as well (Myers et al. 1998) Research also investigates the integration of meetings along the dimensions of time and space (Inoue et al. 1997) as well the integration of ....

Pedersen, E. R., K. McCall, T. P. Moran and F. G. Halasz (1993). "Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings," In Proceedings of ACM 1993 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, pp. 391-398.

....situation. KEYWORDS: CSCW, video, evaluation, shared workspace INTRODUCTION In recent years a great deal of attention has been given to video conferencing in a variety of forms, and in particular to the integration of video conferencing facilities with computer software and workstations [2, 4, 9, 11]. Much of this work tends to involve the development or innovation of new systems, and then the observation of how users behave when provided with these facilities. This aspect of CSCW research is still really at the first of Card s four growth stages [1] that is the design and implementation of ....

Pedersen, E.R., McCall, K., Moran, T.P. & Halasz, F.G. (1993). Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. In InterCHI'93 Conference Proceedings, 391- 398.

....areas above. An important aspect of paper notebooks is their ease of use. The interface to Dynomite is similar to a standard paper notebook. Users see a screen with the appearance of a page in a traditional notebook and enter freeform hand written notes that are stored as digital ink. The Tivoli [12] system is similar, in that it emulates whiteboard functionality on a Liveboard. Microsoft s aha Inkwriter [9] mimics a word processor by reformatting ink to fit the columns of a page, and allows users to edit handwritten notes. Users of the Paper based Audio Notebook [14] take notes on paper ....

....pages. Pen strokes are entered on a page of notes and are stored in a structure which includes their time stamp and property. Pen strokes are clustered by time, so that strokes created sequentially without a pause are grouped. Several gestures are available to assist with the input, as in Tivoli [12]. An insertion gesture creates more space above and below the point of insertion, a delete gesture deletes the last group of strokes, and an undo gesture repeatedly reverts the last change. A horizontal line gesture causes a new page of notes to be created, as in the Marquee [15] video annotation ....

E. Pedersen, K. McCall, T. Moran, and F. Halasz. Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. Proceedings CHI '93 (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 1993), ACM Press, 391-398.

.... of CSCW researchers and developers have insisted that synchronous groupware systems should avoid technological methods for floor control altogether, in favor of social methods [Akscyn et al. 1988, Beaudouin Lafon and Karsenty, 1992, Condon, 1993, Ishii and Ohkubo, 1990, Ohkubo and Ishii, 1990, Pedersen et al. 1993, Shu and Flowers, 1992] The fact that forms of floor control are used effectively in purely social situations (e.g. face to face conversations) has led them to argue that technological support for it is not feasible and or not desirable (e.g. Condon, 1993] especially in the event that ....

....being discussed are such that collaboration awareness is relatively good while the need for concurrency control and similar measures is relatively absent. This is true, for example, with TeamWorkStation [Ishii and Ohkubo, 1990, Ohkubo and Ishii, 1990] Clearboard [Ishii et al. 1992] and Tivoli [Pedersen et al. 1993], which are whiteboard simulations. In other cases, however, the forms of floor control being criticized are restrictive and are not well supported by means for collaboration awareness, e.g. Beaudouin Lafon and Karsenty, 1992, Condon, 1993, Shu and Flowers, 1992] 29 CHAPTER II A FRAMEWORK ....

Pedersen, E. R., McCall, K., Moran, T. P., and Halasz, F. G. (1993). Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In

....box inclusion is employed in one and a half mode systems. With multiple modes, a gesture mode or wipe mode may be provided in addition to the basic draw mode. While these systems afford a rich set of interactions, using the system is not easy for the novice or casual user. Examples are Tivoli [14], 9] 10] and PerSketch [15] In systems with a gesture mode, allowing the selection gesture to be a closed curve of any shape provides a more flexible inclusion grouping than the standard inclusion rectangle provided in the one and a half mode systems. Tivoli has a wipe mode, in which a user ....

Pedersen, E.R., McCall, K., Moran, T.P., and Halasz, F.G. Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. Proceedings of InterCHI'93. ACM, New York, pp. 391-398.

....typically contain shared workspaces where the actors can see each others manipulations, video cameras so the actors can see each other, voice transmission allowing oral communication, etc. Some more simple systems provides only some of the facilities, e.g. shared whiteboard facilities (e.g. Pedersen et al. 1993), or video conferencing systems (e.g. Isaacs et al. 1994) Another tradition concerns collaborative writing, i.e. systems that enables a number of users distributed in space to work on the same document at the same time, e.g. GROVE (Ellis et al. 1991) or ShrEdit (Olson et al. 1990) Also ....

Pedersen, Elin Rnby, Kim McCall, Thomas P. Moran, and Frank G. Halasz: "Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings," in INTERCHI'93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Amsterdam, edited by S. Ashlund at al., ACM Press, 1993, pp. 391-398.

....the meaning of data by discussing, analyzing, and repeatedly reviewing it together. Researchers examining the use of technologies for group work point out the importance of natural interactions between team members, especially when using computers to assist or support the team s activities [15], 12] Issues involve shared displays, turn taking, recording activities and modes of interaction with objects. ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK At Andersen Consulting, we employ data collection methods such as video ethnography and contextual inquiry to observe everyday work practices, organizations ....

....and sketches with the materials stored in the computer. When the walls are covered with paper linked to the computer via barcodes, the entire room, in essence, becomes a huge computer display. CONNECTING PAPER TO THE COMPUTER The uses of paper and whiteboards by teams is well understood [12] [15]. 17] Paper is used for reading, sketching, and annotating. Similarly, whiteboards are used for sketching, capturing emerging thoughts and viewing materials. The use of whiteboards in the Insight Lab is discussed in the section on Linked Images on the following page. Sellen and O Hara s ....

Pedersen, E., McCall, K., Moran, T., and Halasz, F. Tivoli: an Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings, in Proceedings of InterCHI 93(Amsterdam, May 1993), ACM Press, 391-398.

....Its physical presence and informal writing interface leads to characteristic usage style quite different from standard desktop systems. Given the observation, we are working on computationally enhanced whiteboard system, called Flatland. Compared with other research projects on electric boards [2,3], we are especially interested in the software system to support persistent strokes on the board. Whiteboards are used daily basis, and strokes on it can be present for weeks. New strokes are drawn on some open space, resulting in a several clusters of strokes on the surface. The user sometimes ....

....to the user by a boundary surrounding its strokes. When the user draws a stroke on some open space, a new segment is assigned for the stroke. If a stroke is drawn within or close to an existing segment, the stroke joins to the segment. Unlike other whiteboard systems based on explicit grouping [2], these segmenting operations are completely automatic. If necessary, the user can also manually control it using splitting and joining operations. Segments are not allowed to overlap each other. The user can drag the segment by grabbing its boundary, but if the segment collides with another ....

Prderson,E., McCall,K., Moran,T.P., Halasz,F., Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings, INTERCHI'93, pp,391-399.

....Slides have to be prepared in a specified format. The slides can be annotated with text and marks drawn with a mouse, but the video images cannot be annotated. A confederation of multimedia tools for meeting capture and salvage [10] uses the Tivoli ( 11] 12] system running on a LiveBoard [13]. Slides created and annotated in Tivoli are captured together with the audio during a meeting. Tivoli is designed to support working meetings. The group notes to the meeting are the Tivoli whiteboard pages with ink strokes, graphical objects, and type text notes beamed up from a laptop. The ....

Pedersen, E. R., McCall, K., Moran, T. P., and Halasz, F. G. Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. Proceedings of INTERCHI '93. ACM Press, pp. 391-398.

....popular tools in environments ranging from the kindergarten to the company boardroom. BrightBoard aims to capitalise on this natural means of expression by making use of the whiteboard as a user interface. It is not the first system to explore the whiteboard s potential. Projects such as Tivoli [11] have tried to capitalise on this natural means of expression, and have created note taking, shared drawing and even remote conferencing systems by emulating and enhancing a whiteboard using a computer. There have been many variations on the whiteboard theme as well. VideoWhiteboard [15] used a ....

Pedersen, E., McCall, K., Moran, T.P. and Halasz, F.G., "Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings", Proceedings of INTERCHI, ACM, 1993, pp. 391-398.

....or video with some other artifact that is produced during the live experience, typically typed or handwritten notes. Some of these systems are built to support the needs of an individual within some larger, group experience, such as a meeting. Examples include Filochat [27] Marquee [25] Tivoli [18], Dynomite [28] We Met [29] and Audio Notebook [24] Other work has focussed on supporting the entire group, such as all students in a lecture. Examples of this include Classroom 2000 [2, 3, 6] and STREAMS [8] Still others have attempted to support a single individual in more free flowing ....

....in the same way that they use any traditional whiteboard. Others have attempted to build systems to support realistic whiteboard interaction using a collection of freeform interaction techniques on a pen based, projectionassisted electronic whiteboard. Among them are DynaWall [10] Tivoli [18], M Pad [19] Dynomite [28] and We Met [29] A common theme in these projects is to use special gestures or marking techniques with the electronic ink to provide either editing commands or to structure to the ink. The gestures may be actual markings or hand gestures. DynaWall uses hand gestures ....

Pedersen, E., McCall, K., Moran, T.P., and Halasz, F. Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. Proceedings of INTERCHI'93. pp. 391-389.

....of people working together. Related Work Several projects support people collaborating in the same room. The CoLab project, like other electronic meeting rooms, provided each member with a desktop computer which allowed private work as well as control of a shared display at the front of the room [17]. Earlier shared rooms were built by Krueger as installation art pieces [13] One drawback of electronic collaborative rooms is that they require expensive, specialized hardware that is prohibitive to many people who could benefit from enhanced support for co present collaboration, for example ....

....prohibitive to many people who could benefit from enhanced support for co present collaboration, for example school children. The Liveboard digital whiteboard and the Tivoli application enabled multiple simultaneous users (both co present and remote) to interact with the shared digital whiteboard [17]. The authors point out that simultaneous use of the whiteboard rarely occurred and they speculated that the lack of adequate software level support for co present collaboration (of the kind presented in this paper) may have been the cause. The Pebbles project [15] investigates the use of ....

Pedersen, E. R., McCall, K., Moran, T. P., & Halasz, F. G. (1993). Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (InterCHI 93) ACM Press, pp. 391-398.

....requirements identified by the group members after they were introduced to basic technology, i.e. not yet the system to be built. They were provided with a large electronic computer based display (we used a Xerox LiveBoard 1 ) but without any dedicated meeting support software, as e.g. Tivoli [21]. The group used only their standard text editor which was operated by a scribe using a keyboard from a 1. The LiveBoard [6] developed at Xerox PARC, is a directly interactive, large area display (which can be operated with a cordless stylus but also with mouse and keyboard) for creating and ....

....In order to implement and test our ideas it was necessary to have the appropriate equipment available. We are using two SUN based Xerox LiveBoards [6] in order to realize interactive electronic whiteboards. One should note, that there is an application for the LiveBoard called Tivoli [21] which was created at Xerox PARC. For a discussion of Tivoli with respect to DOLPHIN see section 6. In order to provide the group members with computers, we currently use SUN SPARCstations and compatible SPARCbooks. 3.1 Document Model of DOLPHIN As described in section 2, facilitating cooperation ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Pedersen, E., McCall, K., Moran, T., Halasz,F. Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings, Proceedings of the InterCHI'93 Conference, Amsterdam (April 2429, 1993), 391-398.

....a first step in addressing the problem of display space, interactive electronic whiteboards [1] have been developed. Their major advantage is the ability to present information to a group of people. For interactive tasks with more than one user, the input facility of these boards has to be shared [3] since the boards are still single user devices. This situation is intensified by the boards resolutions which are comparable to those of desktop computers. In short, these boards are still too small. A device that is able to facilitate group work in settings like project rooms has to be much ....

Pedersen, E.R. et al.: Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings, Proceedings of InterCHI'93, pp. 391-398.

....to the reasons listed for this guideline, using modes or states can sometimes add to a user s cognitive load because (s)he has to remember which mode or state (s)he is in. This problem is increased when there are multiple users. An example of how states can be problematic was documented by Pedersen et al. 1993] for the design of Tivoli, an electronic whiteboard. An important design issue for Tivoli was the means by which to enable different users to use the board. It was decided that the board would support three different pens and that different states were necessary. The two states were pen state ....

....functionality and intuitiveness. It is often the case that increasing functionality results in a less intuitive system. One of the conclusions regarding the interface 63 design for Tivoli, for example, was that the designers had erred in favour of increased functionality over intuitiveness [Pedersen, 1993]. Greenberg and Bohnet [1991] on the other hand, reported that computer literate users desired increased functionality in GroupSketch. Sasse and Fentem [1994] suggest in their sixth guideline that workspaces should provide an amount of functionality that is appropriate to the users abilities and ....

Pedersen E.R., McCall, K., Moran, T., and Halasz, F.G. (1993). Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. INTERCHI' 93 Conference Proceedings, (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 27-29), 391-398.

....areas above. An important aspect of paper notebooks is their ease of use. The interface to Dynomite is similar to a standard paper notebook. Users see a screen with the appearance of a page in a traditional notebook and enter freeform hand written notes that are stored as digital ink. The Tivoli [12] system is similar, in that it emulates whiteboard functionality on a Liveboard. Microsoft s aha Inkwriter [9] mimics a word processor by reformatting ink to fit the columns of a page, and allows users to edit handwritten notes. Users of the Paper based Audio Notebook [14] take notes on paper ....

....pages. Pen strokes are entered on a page of notes and are stored in a structure which includes their time stamp and property. Pen strokes are clustered by time, so that strokes created sequentially without a pause are grouped. Several gestures are available to assist with the input, as in Tivoli [12]. An insertion gesture creates more space above and below the point of insertion, a delete gesture deletes the last group of strokes, and an undo gesture repeatedly reverts the last change. A horizontal line gesture causes a new page of notes to be created, as in the Marquee [15] video annotation ....

E. Pedersen, K. McCall, T. Moran, and F. Halasz. Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. Proceedings CHI '93 (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 1993), ACM Press, 391-398.

.... from the lack of force feedback [1] Although there have been no previous reported attempts to introduce handwriting into immersive VEs, there is a significant body of research investigating the application of handwriting recognition and pen input for conventional 2D interfaces (see, for example, [7, 8, 9]) There have also been a few attempts to apply pen input and 2D gestures to interaction with 3D environments. For example, the SKETCH system, developed at Brown University, allows the user to quickly sketch 3D scenes by drawing predefined 2D gestures using a mouse or pen [10] and in systems by ....

....notebook can be clean pages, pages with notes entered previously or any document or image which the user has added to the notebook. Below we discuss interaction techniques currently implemented in Virtual Notepad. 3.2.1 Taking notes in the virtual notepad. Like the Tivoli electronic whiteboard [8] and the Dynamite electronic notebook [7] Virtual Notepad uses digital ink without recognition approach. The user enters notes using freeform handwriting, which is captured as a collection of strokes digital ink. This digital ink approach allows participants to take notes on any part of the ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Pedersen, E., McCall, K., Moran, T., Halasz, F., Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. Proceedings of INTERCHI'93. 1993. ACM. pp. 509-516.

....pen based electronic (rear projected) display. This provides a whiteboard size interactive display that allows us to experience and experiment with groupcomputer interaction in a way not possible with smaller displays, such as workstations. We have developed a software application, called Tivoli [16], that simulates whiteboard functionality on the LiveBoard (or any other display) Tivoli provides basic pen based scribbling and editing with pen based gesturing and wiping techniques. In this paper, we use the term board to refer to an interactive electronic whiteboard. We extended Tivoli ....

Pedersen, E., McCall, K., Moran, T. P., & Halasz, F. (1993). Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. Proceedings of INTERCHI'93, 391-389.

.... techniques, mostly focused on personal use on tablets, based on a variety of metaphors: from writing in notebooks [20, 21] to sketching on napkins [3] or onionskin [4] There is also some research on pen based interaction with wall size displays supporting a whiteboard metaphor for meetings (e.g. [15, 19, 22]) There are several products providing the basic whiteboard scribbling functionality, but effective pen based meeting tools beyond scribbling is still in the research stage. We have been working for several years on a program of research to provide computational meeting tools based on a ....

....a large, shared, pen based electronic (rear projected) display. This provides a whiteboard size interactive display that allows us to experience and experiment with group computer interaction in a way not possible with smaller displays. We have developed a software application, called Tivoli [15], that simulates whiteboard functionality on the LiveBoard (or any other display) Tivoli provides basic pen based scribbling and editing with pen based gesturing and wiping techniques. In this paper, we use the term board to refer to an interactive electronic whiteboard. We extended Tivoli to ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Pedersen, E., McCall, K., Moran, T. P., & Halasz, F. (1993). Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. Proceedings of INTERCHI'93, 391-389.

....You Perceive Is What You Get) image editors. We explore this idea within the context of freehand line drawing editors in which the user manipulates digital ink in an Electronic Whiteboard or Electronic Sketchpad application. Underlying our approach are several goals for this class of systems [6, 8] The user interface must be transparent and immediately accessible, with increased functionality coming in layers that the user can either acquire or not: one should be able to walk up and just draw, oblivious to whatever the computer underneath is doing. The user shouldn t have to worry about ....

....support many graphical editing tasks but is too slow for unimpeded handwriting. The system has not been used by a large number of people. Its intent however is not for production use but as a vehicle to explore extensions to existing electronic whiteboard systems such as the Tivoli drawing program [8] which does have a substantial user community. MAINTAINING PERCEPTUAL INTERPRETATIONS Motivation Out of the array of light and dark elements comprising an image, the human visual system constructs a richly articulated description across multiple spatial scales and multiple levels of abstraction. ....

Pedersen, E., McCall, K., Moran, T., and Halasz, F. Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. Proceedings of the InterCHI93 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. ACM, New York, 1993.

.... previously been explored in a program for editing images of machine printed text (that is, bitmap images of text as opposed to internally structured ascii representations of text) in terms of covertly recognized word, line and column structure [1] More recently, an electronic whiteboard program [14, 11] has been augmented with WYPIWYG recognition tools to interpret digital ink markings in terms of list and column structure [12] The present paper discusses the PerSketch image editor, which develops WYPIWYG image editing in the direction of interpretating digital ink markings in terms of ....

....T. Chiu, P. van Melle, B. and Kurtenbach, G. Implicit Structures for Pen Based Systems Within a Freeform Interaction Paradigm. Chi95. 1995. 13] Okazaki, S. and Tsuji, Y. An Adaptive Recognition Method for Line Drawings Using Construction Rules. NEC Research and Development Journal, 92 (1989) [14] Pedersen, E. McCall, K. Moran, T. and Halasz, F. Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. Proceedings of the InterCHI93 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. ACM, New York, 1993. 15] Sarkar, S. and Boyer, K. Integration, Inference, and Management of ....

Pedersen, E., McCall, K., Moran, T., and Halasz, F. Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. Proceedings of the InterCHI93 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. ACM, New York, 1993.

No context found.

Pedersen, E.R., McCall, K., Moran, T. and Halasz, F. Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In Proc. CHI 1993, ACM Press (1993), 391-398.

No context found.

Pedersen, E. R., McCall K., Moran, T. P., Halasz, F. G. Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In Proceedings of CHI 1993, pp. 391-398.

No context found.

Pedersen, E., McCall, K., Moran, T.P., and Halasz, F. (1993). Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. Proc. of InterCHI 1993, 391-398.

No context found.

Pedersen, E. R., McCall, K., Moran T. P. and Halasz, F. G. (1993): Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. Proceedings of ACM INTERCHI'93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 391-398, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co.

No context found.

Pedersen, E. McCall, K., Moran, T., & Halasz, F. (1993). Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In Proc. of InterCHI '93. 391-398.

No context found.

Pedersen, E.R., McCall, K., Moran, T.P., Halasz, F.G. (1993). Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (InterCHI 93) ACM Press, pp. 391-398.

No context found.

Pedersen, E.R., et al. Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In the Proceedings of ACM INTERCHI

No context found.

Pedersen, E. R., K. McCall, et al. Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In the Proceedings of ACM INTERCHI '93, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1993) 391-398.

No context found.

Pedersen, E. R., McCall, K, Moran, T. P., and Halasz, F. G., "Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings" Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 93) , 1993.

No context found.

Pedersen, E.R., McCall, K., Moran, T.P., Halasz, F.G., (1993). Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. In Proc. of CHI'93. 391-398.

No context found.

E. Pedersen, K. McCall, T. P. Moran, and F. Halasz. Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In Proceedings of InterCHI 93, pages 391--398, 1993.

No context found.

Pedersen, E., McCall, K., Moran, T., Halasz, F. (1993). Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings, Proceedings of InterCHI'93 Conference, pp. 391-398.

No context found.

PEDERSEN, E., MCCALL, K., MORAN, T., HALASZ, F. (1993). Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meeting. In Proceedings of InterCHI'93, Amsterdam. ACM Press: New York, 391-399.

No context found.

Pedersen, E. R., McCall, K., Moran, T. P., and Halasz, F. G. (1993). Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. Proceedings of INTERCHI '93. ACM Press, pp. 391-398.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC