Sawyer, P., Sommerville, I., & Viller, S. (1997). Requirements process improvement through the phased introduction of good practice. Software Process - Improvement and Practice 3(1), 19--34.  Home/Search   Document Details and Download   Summary   Related Articles

....changes and structure of requirements. The results suggest further works dealing with requirements evolution. 1 INTRODUCTION Requirements specification is one of the most important phases of the software life cycle (Berry Lawrence 1998; Davis Hsia 1994; Siddiqi Shekaran 1996; Sommerville Sawyer 1997a) The recovery activity is more cost effective during the requirements specification phase than subsequent phases (i.e. design specification, coding, testing, etc. Boehm 1981; Boehm 1984) Recent research has pointed out interesting aspects of changing requirements (Lam 1997; PROTEUS Project ....

....stakeholders knowledge evolution, business targets, etc. Requirements are interdependent on one another. Current methods in requirements engineering emphasise the need for the management and representation of multi perspectives and evolving requirements (Nuseibeh, Kramer, Finkelstein 1994; Sawyer, Sommerville, Viller 1997; Siddiqi Shekaran 1996; Sommerville Sawyer 1997b; Sommerville Sawyer 1997a) From the requirements process viewpoint there is actually the need for providing tools which help in the management of the process with predictive features. Recent research in requirements engineering (PROTEUS ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Sawyer, P., Sommerville, I., & Viller, S. (1997). Requirements process improvement through the phased introduction of good practice. Software Process - Improvement and Practice 3(1), 19--34.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC