| S. J. Garland and J. V. Guttag. LP: The Larch Prover. In E. Lusk and R. Overbeek, editors, 9th International Conference on Automated Deduction (Argonne, Illinois), pages 748--750. Springer Verlag, 1988. |
....development steps. A second generation of formal methods aims at a more comprehensive approach to support software development across a broader spectrum of the development life cycle [BMPP88, Smi91, ORSS92] However, even for the more sophisticated machine supported approaches (such as Larch [GG88, Gut91] Lambda [MHF 92] Hol [Gor86, CGM87] and Isabelle [Pau87, NP92] the main emphasis is not laid on development issues but on proof techniques (such as tactics) or on the integration of specification and programming concepts (such as the Larch Interface Languages [GH91] Much less ....
S. J. Garland and J. V. Guttag. LP: The Larch Prover. In E. Lusk and R. Overbeek, editors, 9th International Conference on Automated Deduction (Argonne, Illinois), pages 748--750. Springer Verlag, 1988.
....with the assembler as its target language, and an operating system kernel. This verification used the BoyerMoore theorem prover [2] There are many other impressive verification examples carried out on a variety of systems including Coq [7] EVES [8] IMPS [14] HOL [17] Isabelle [25] LP [15], Nuprl [6] and RRL [19] to name a few. The main challenge is to make mechanical verification less arduous and more perspicuous. Specific challenges are in the design of expressive specification languages that interact synergistically with mechanization the integration of decision ....
Stephen J. Garland and John V. Guttag. LP: The Larch prover. In E. Lusk and R. Overbeek, editors, 9th International Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE), volume 310 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 748--749, Argonne, IL, May 1988. Springer-Verlag.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC