D. Rayner. Future directions for protocol testing, learning the lessons from the past. In Testing of Communicating Systems: IFIT TC6 10th International Workshop on Testing of Communicating Systems, pages 3--17, Cheju Island, Korea, September 1997. Chapman and Hall.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....often justifies any extra expense created by introducing testability. This approach, in which testability is designed into a system, is particularly prevalent in the design and test of hardware components (see, for example, 21] but has been proposed in other areas (see, for example, [23]) The standard (automated) test generation algorithm used with stream Xmachines assumes that certain conditions, called design for test conditions, hold. Where the design for test conditions hold the test generated by this method is guaranteed to determine the correctness of the IUT ( 17] This ....

D. Rayner. Future directions for protocol testing, learning the lessons from the past. In Testing of Communicating Systems: IFIT TC6 10th International Workshop on Testing of Communicating Systems, pages 3--17, Cheju Island, Korea, September 1997. Chapman and Hall.

....e ectiveness often justi es any extra expense created by introducing testability. This approach, in which testability is designed into a system, is particularly prevalent in the design and test of hardware components (see, for example, 21] but has been proposed in other areas (see, for example, [23]) The standard (automated) test generation algorithm used with stream Xmachines assumes that certain conditions, called design for test conditions, hold. Where the design for test conditions hold the test generated by this method is guaranteed to determine the correctness of the IUT ( 18] This ....

D. Rayner. Future directions for protocol testing, learning the lessons from the past. In Testing of Communicating Systems: IFIT TC6 10th International Workshop on Testing of Communicating Systems, pages 3-17, Cheju Island, Korea, September 1997. Chapman and Hall.

....interoperability testing approaches require additional monitor points for monitoring communication [4] Currently, there exists no notion of such monitor points in CTMF, i.e. in these cases CTMF can not be used. Summaries of some interoperability testing approaches and projects can be found in [17] and [24] 3.3. Functional testing beyond OSI In the last couple of years, several new software architectures for distributed systems have been developed. Examples are the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) 15] the OSF Distributed Computing Environment (DCE) 18] the ISO ITU T ....

D. Rayner. Future directions for protocol testing, learning the lessons from the past. In M. Kim, S. Kang, K. Hong, editors, Testing of Communicating Systems, volume 10, Chapman & Hall, September 1997.

....Study Group meeting. The nal decision to publish the INAP CS 2 specication as an ITUT Recommendation was made in May 1998. However, in both standards, the SDL description is published as normative annex with the same status as the textual description. As already mentioned by Dave Rayner in [18], the development of the INAP CS 2 SDL description was a breakthrough for the use of SDL in standardization. 3.2 The SDL specication In a layered architecture, a protocol provides its service to the upper layers by using the service of the lower layers. The provided service is described in a ....

D. Rayner. Future Directions for Protocol Testing, Learning Lessions from the Past. Testing of Communicating Systems, vol. 10, Chapman & Hall, 1997.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC