| T. Moehlman and V. Lesser. Cooperative planning and decentralized negotiation in Multi-Fireboss Phoenix. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Planning, Scheduling and Control, pages 144--159, San Diego, California, November 1990. |
....be totally satisfied by the final agreement. The negotiation process can be seen as a search in a dynamic space consisting of the agents beliefs about other agents beliefs. This space changes dynamically as the agents proposals are revealed. Another example is the Multi Fireboss Phoenix system [60]. Planning (the actions needed to assess and contain fires) is performed by several spatially distributed agents. The system addresses, through a sophisticated negotiation protocol, the dynamic allocation of resources. Less work has been done within DAI on the subject of reaching a consensus in ....
T. Moehlman and V. Lesser. Cooperative planning and decentralized negotiation in Multi-Fireboss Phoenix. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Planning, Scheduling and Control, pages 144--159, San Diego, California, November 1990.
....can easily be modified to deal with dynamic priorities. Since the search is guided by the vote taken at each step, it is possible to allow the agents to change their tastes or priorities over time (for example, due to environmental changes) As an example, in the MultiFireboss Phoenix system [ Moehlman and Lesser, 1990 ] planning (the actions needed to assess and contain fires) is performed by several spatially distributed agents. The system addresses, through a sophisticated negotiation protocol, the dynamic allocation of resources. Our algorithm would solve this problem in a direct manner, without ....
T. Moehlman and V. Lesser. Cooperative planning and decentralized negotiation in Multi-Fireboss Phoenix. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Planning, Scheduling and Control, pages 144--159, San Diego, November 1990.
....examples of how their language can support the implementation of DAI techniques for identifying what agents can do and assigning tasks among them. This paper thus presents an effort in developing tools and languages for building DAI systems [4, 31, 42, 59] and for experimenting with DAI systems [55, 67, 68] DAI agents need facilities for representing, maintaining, and propagating what they believe about the world. What makes building such facilities difficult is that slow and potentially errorful communication among the agents makes converging on common knowledge where everyone knows that ....
Theresa Moehlman and Victor Lesser. Cooperative planning and decentralized negotiation in multi-fireboss phoenix. In Proceedings of the 1990 DARPA Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Planning, Scheduling, and Control, pages 144--159, November 1990.
....can be acquired and exploited (i.e. reducing solution uncertainty) Both areas are concerned with distributed resource allocation. The first, the Multi Fireboss Phoenix application, requires cooperative planning among agents to arrive at an acceptable plan to fight the outstanding fires [35]. Agent interaction focuses on loaning bulldozers by one agent to another agent that has insufficient local resources to effectively fight the fires in its region. The second, and more developed application, involves restoring transmission paths for dedicated circuits in a long haul communications ....
Moehlman, T. and Lesser, V. "Cooperative Planning and Decentralized Negotiation in Multi-Fireboss Phoenix," Proceedings of the Workshop on Innovative Approaches to 43 Planning, Scheduling and Control Workshop, November 1990, pp. 144-159. Morgan Kaufmann.
No context found.
T. Moehlman and V. Lesser. Cooperative planning and decentralized negotiation in Multi-Fireboss Phoenix. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Planning, Scheduling and Control, pages 144--159, San Diego, California, November 1990.
No context found.
Moehlman, T. and Lesser, V., Cooperative planning and decentralized negotiation in multi-Fireboss Phoenix, DARPA Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Planning, Scheduling and Control,# 1990, pp. 144-159.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC