;;if their order is similar, this is good. If the item is a function, ;; ignore since order comparisons give false support here.

 Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles  

This paper is cited in the following contexts:
The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples - Falkenhainer, Forbus, Gentner (1989)   (84 citations)  (Correct)

....or indirectly by installing relationships between them. Syntactically, these rules are similar to the match constructor rules. For example, assert same functor) rule ( intern (MH b t) test (and (expression b) expression t) eq (expression functor b) expression functor t) (assert (implies same functor (MH b t) 0.5 . 0.0) states that if the base item and target item of a match hypothesis are expressions with the same functors, then supply 0.5 evidence in favor of the match hypothesis. The assertion of same functor provides a global record for explanatory purposes that this factor was considered in ....

....by passing evidence from a match involving a relationship to the matches involving its arguments. The following rule accomplishes this, propagating 80 of a match hypothesis belief to its offspring: rule ( intern (MH b1 t1) intern (MH b2 t2) test (children of b2 t2 b1 t1) (assert (implies (MH b1 t1) MH b2 t2) 0.8 . 0.0) The Structure Mapping Engine 22 The more matched structure that exists above a given match hypothesis, the more that hypothesis will be believed. The effect cascades, so that entity mappings involved in a large systematic structure receive much higher scores than those which are ....

;;if their order is similar, this is good. If the item is a function, ;; ignore since order comparisons give false support here.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC