| Epstein, R. and P. Hawthorn, "Design Decisions for the Intelligent Database Machine," Proceedings of the 1980 National Computer Conference, pp. 237-241. |
....of benchmarks run on three conventional database management systems and two database machines. More specifically we have measured and compared the performance of the database machine DIRECT [DEWI79, BORA82] the Britton Lee IDM 500 database machine with and without a database accelerator (DAC) [IDM500, EPST80, UBEL81], the commercial and university versions of the INGRES database system [STON76, STON80] and the ORACLE database system. Since database machines have already been an active field of research for an entire decade, and a few machines have now been implemented, we feel that the time has come for ....
Epstein, R. and P. Hawthorn, "Design Decisions for the Intelligent Database Machine," Proceedings of the 1980 National Computer Conference, pp. 237-241.
....to model environments where there is no predetermined structure to objects. A second example of the need for procedural fields is indicated in the next subsection. 2.2. Stored Queries Most data base systems which preprocess commands in advance of execution (e.g. System R [ASTR76] and the IDM [EPST80]) store access plans or compiled code in the data base system. Such systems already manage a data base of compiled queries. Their implementations would become somewhat cleaner if data base commands became full fledged data base objects. For example, the precompiler for a programming language ....
Epstein, R., and Hawthorn, P., "Design Decisions for the Intelligent Database Machine," Proc. 1980 National Computer Conference, Anaheim, Ca., May 1980.
No context found.
Epstein, R. and P. Hawthorn, "Design Decisions for the Intelligent Database Machine," Proceedings of the 1980 National Computer Conference, pp. 237-241.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC