R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System", ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5(2), Apr. 1986.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....We are working to extend our SOLO objects to include tailorable such collaborative semantics. 1 User interface events such as mouse button clicks and key presses. 17 Smith, Redden An access model for shared interfaces THE ARCHITECTURE We have realised our model using the X Windowing system [17], the OSF Motif Widget set, C and ISIS operating on a UNIX platform. Our architecture, SOL, consists of a number of key elements. The server is a permanent process, all others such as applications are created and destroyed as required. The diagram below shows the architecture when one user is ....

Scheifler, R.W., Gettys, J. "The X Window System." ACM Transactions on Graphics Vol: 5 (2), Pages: 79-109.

....the H.261 recommendations h261 decode being an image decoder compatible with h261 encode and also satisfying the H. 261 recommendations The software is designed to operating under the UNIX operating system [24,21] making use of the X Windows system for the purposes of display of the images [23,19]. The encoder has been designed to function with the VideoPix video frame grabber for Sun Microsystem s computers. Although, the encoder also works by taking undecoded image files as input. The codec then compresses the image in accordance with the H.261 standard and either transmits the image to ....

Scheifler R. and Gettys J., "The X Window System", ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 5, pp. 79--109, April 1986.

....Sun workstations and allows a video server to distribute NTSC standard video images to video client workstations elsewhere on the network. The video input can be selected from either a video camera or a VCR attached to the server. Clients can then view video in a window using the X window system [8]. Up to four video clients can be supported simultaneously, all watching the same video source. In our environment, the video application is found to perform poorly. While the NTSC standard specifies a frame rate of 30 images per second, in practice we observe approximately 1 image per second for ....

....study of the network traffic workload produced by the VideoPix application. To our surprise, it turned out that the Ethernet was not the performance bottleneck at all. Rather, the performance limits come from current display technology and software overheads in the X window system and TCP IP [2, 8]. The purpose of this paper, then, is to present the highlights of our experimental study of the VideoPix application. The paper focuses on the network traffic measurement and workload characterization aspects of the study. S. Gupta An Experimental Study Of Video Traffic (Draft) 3 The ....

R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System", ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 79-109, April 1986.

....of user interaction resources (keyboard input, graphical screen output) automatic partitioning finds competition in several existing technologies for transparent distribution. These technologies include Java servlets and text graphics input output redirection protocols like telnet and X Windows [14]. All of the above are rudimentary adaptors for distributed computing: they allow executing a program on a different computer than the one managing the input output. Nevertheless, all application processing still occurs on a single network site. In contrast, when automatic application partitioning ....

Robert W. Scheifler, and Jim Gettys, "The X Window System", ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5(2): 79-109, April 1986.

....utilization. Some applications, however, produce bursty traffic that causes the network utilization by clients and servers to increase significantly. The bandwidth requirements are particularly high for applications that display documents, images, or video. 1 Introduction The X Window System [8] is a network transparent window system that provides high performance, high level, device independent graphics. The X interface has become very popular in Local Area Network (LAN) environments. LANs generally consist of diskless personal workstations connected to a shared file server over an ....

....mouse input back to the appropriate clients. Multiple clients can have connections open to a server simultaneously, and a client can have connections open to multiple servers simultaneously. The servers and the clients communicate through a network protocol that is a simple block stream protocol [8]. The communication protocol is followed even when the client program runs on the same workstation as the server. The protocol is layered on top of a reliable duplex byte stream. The stream is based on a local interprocess communication mechanism if the client and the server run on the same ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System", ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 79-109, April 1986.

....of sufficiently high level to facilitate functional expression, ease of use, and flexibility in the creation of windows, dialogue boxes, menus, palettes, buttons, text and graphics, all to be mouse and keyboard controlled. Although the current prototype is being developed under OSF Motif [4] in X [5] on Unix, in future, through the use of windowindependent development toolkit (e.g. OIT from Neuron Data for X, MacOS, OS 2 or Microsoft Windows) HyperEDIT will be available on a number of hardware and operating system platforms, i.e. Unix X Windows, VMS DECwindows, Microsoft Windows, MacOS, ....

Scheifler, R. W., Gettys, J. 1990 "X Window System" Digital Press

....Finally, the task of developing a cooperative environment is greatly reduced. Instead of reimplementing many existing applications, the developers only have to implement a shared window system. Many desktop conferencing systems offer application sharing capabilities for the X Window System [33]. X is a networktransparent, device independent windowing and graphics system currently supported by most leading workstation manufacturers. With these desktop conferencing systems, quite a number of shared window systems have been built [1, 16, 4, 5, 9, 11, 18, 23, 27, 24, 28, 29] From the ....

Robert W. Scheifler, Jim Gettys: "The X Window System". ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 79 - 109. ACM Press, 1986.

....Each of these programs was implemented in the most obvious, and straight forward fashion. The applications were: 19 . typing (interactive class) This application emulates a user typing to a text editor by receiving a series of characters from a serial input line and using the X window server [60] to display them to the frame buffer. video (continuous media class) This is a real time video player application (e.g. as used for television, teleconferencing) that attempts to show frames of video at a constant rate. Video captures data from a digitizer board, dithers to 8 bit ....

....(batch) This is the Dhrystone benchmark (Version 1.1) a synthetic benchmark that measures CPU integer performance. Typing (interactive) This application emulates a user typing to a text editor by receiving a series of characters from a serial input line and using the X window server [60] to display them to the frame buffer. To enable a realistic and repeatable sequence of typed keystrokes for interactive applications, a hardware keyboard simulator was constructed and attached via a serial line to the testbed workstation. This device is capable of recording a sequence of keyboard ....

R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System", ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5(2), pp. 79-109, Apr. 1986.

....to be successful. Depending upon the flag given to the constructor an RMP ring is formed or an already existing ring is joined. The application should give control to the ROL regularly to do its internal processing. This is done by using an event loop style of programming similar to X Windows [SWG86]. In the event loop the application gives control to ROL and can do part of its processing. The ROL does its internal processing and notifies application using ROL Events. The application can set callback functions to be invoked upon notification of a ROL Event. Our application sets appropriate ....

Scheifler, Robert W. and James Gettys. "The X-Window System". ACM Transactions on Graphics, No. 5, pages 79-109, April 1986.

....problems. WebNet, an extended WWW browser, aims to overcome these problems through the use of dynamic navigational overview graphs: that is, graphical overviews of the WWW subspace through which the user is navigating. It is implemented using Tcl Tk (Ousterhout 1993) under the X Window System (Scheifler Gettys 1986). The two following subsections describe the user interface to WebNet, and its interface design rationale. 7.1 The WebNet user interface WebNet is shown in Figure 4. Figure 4a is the full functionality version of WebNet that we describe below. Figure 4b shows the tkWWW browser and an ....

Scheifler, R. & Gettys, J. (1986), `The X Window System', ACM Transactions on Graphics 5(2), 79--109.

....of some of these architectures. It should be 16 borne in mind that a number of different sets of abstractions may be employed in a complete system, resulting in more complex architectures. For example, many recent user interface management systems have been written to use the X Window System [Scheifler1986], which is itself a set of abstractions for implementing user interfaces. Our aim here is to show that there are certain basic responsibilities which are commonly taken on by user interface management software as a whole; these responsibilities are summarised in Section 2.1.6. 2.1.1. Graphics ....

....active on one screen at the same time. The window system is a key part of the desktop metaphor style of interface. Common window systems are the Apple Macintosh system [Apple1985] Microsoft s Windows [Microsoft1990] Acorn s RISC OS window system [Acorn1993] and the X Window System [Scheifler1986, Gettys1990]. The graphics abstractions provided by window systems are the logical successors of the graphics libraries described in the previous section. They are usually pixel based however, providing operations such as bit blit [Pike1983] as well as geometric primitives. Some systems provide more complex ....

Robert W. Scheifler and Jim Gettys, "The X Window System", ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 79-109, 1986.

....dialog box : 23 3 1 Introduction The development of graphical user interfaces for applications on a graphical workstation can be time consuming and tedious. To speed up the development of graphical user interfaces under the X Window System [Scheifler 86] the Xt Toolkit was developed [Swick 88] The Xt Toolkit provides the user interface developer (who may not be a programmer) with a set of user interface objects (also called Widgets) and a set of routines to create and manipulate them (called the Intrinsics) These objects provide facilities ....

Robert W. Scheifler and Jim Gettys. "The X Window System". ACM Transactions On Graphics, 5(2):79--109, April 1986.

....dialog box : 23 3 1 Introduction The development of graphical user interfaces for applications on a graphical workstation can be time consuming and tedious. To speed up the development of graphical user interfaces under the X Window System [Scheifler 86, Scheifler 90] the Xt Toolkit was developed [Asente 90] The Xt Toolkit provides the user interface developer (who may not be a programmer) with a set of user interface objects (also called Widgets) and a set of routines to create and manipulate them (called the Intrinsics) These objects provide ....

Robert W. Scheifler and Jim Gettys. "The X Window System". ACM Transactions On Graphics, 5(2):79--109, April 1986.

....application, complete with windows, dialog boxes, buttons, menus, etc. Since the CHSM language system runs under the Unix operating system, a windowing system that also runs under Unix makes the most sense. A wide spread system that runs on many hardware platforms is the X Windows system [10]. However, programming for X Windows directly is fairly complex; user interface tool kits make the job easier. The InterViews tool kit is a library of C classes that define common interactive objects and handle user interaction and operating system events [11] The window system, in this case X ....

Robert W. Scheifler and James Gettys. "The X Window System." ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 5, no. 2, August 1983. pp. 57--69.

....guidance. Direct manipulation techniques are also used in other areas such as manipulation of object stores [Sawyer,88] Tools and techniques to support interactive user interfaces with direct manipulation are also now widely available. Very sophisticated windowing systems such as X windows [Scheiffer,86] are now supplied with most software development systems ranging from PC to mainframe. These windowing environments are proven to increase productivity of prototype development and there are international standards for open software and interoperability [Su,91] The evolution of computer ....

Scheiffer, R. W. and Gettys, J., "The X Window System," ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5(2), pp. 79-109, (April 1986).

....architecture that leverages X Windows WScrawl [79] is a multi user sketchpad built using the X Window system. While WScrawl is not a toolkit, the author describes how his program leverages the communications and display capabilites of X Windows, as well as its client server architecture [67]. X Windows allows a programmer to open several displays, to read input from each workstation, and to write graphics to the screen. Groupware such as WScrawl is created by tracking the display and input stream for each user, all within a single program. Each stream is monitored for input events. ....

Schieffler, R.W. and Gettys, J. (1986) "The X-Windows system." ACM Transactions on Computer Graphics, 5, p79--109.

....as a sound space, with requests for sounds made in terms of high level descriptions of the sound. Like ENO, our toolkit manages shared resources, although the toolkit extends the concept by switching between resources according to their suitability and availability. Similarly, the X Windows system [12] manages a shared resource, this time a graphics server. Again, our toolkit extends this concept by managing resources in multiple output mechanisms and switching between them. Plasticity [13] is the ability of a user interface to be re used on multiple platforms that have different capabilities. ....

R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System," ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 5, pp. 79-109, 1986.

....tool of the CCC 0894 3982 94 030147 15 Received 15 May 1993 1994 by John Wiley Sons, Ltd. Revised 30 October 1993 1998 by University of Nottingham. 148 A. F. CLARK, S. L. CHEAH AND T. K. TAN image processing trade, usually via colour workstations running Unix and the X window system [3]. Taking into account the wish of prospective authors to use familiar tools, an obvious approach is to attempt to graft new facilities onto an existing (and popular) document preparation system. This is the approach that the authors have taken. As a cursory glance at the proceedings of any ....

R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, `The X window system', ACM Trans. Graphics, 5(2), 79--109, (April 1986).

....Display Note that we can be examining several databases and their schemas simultaneously, and within a schema we can be examining many classes and their objects simultaneously. 4. DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION We have built OdeView on top of the UNIX operating system and using the X environment [25]. We used HP Xwidgets to build the graphical interface. At present, we have completed the implementation of the browsing facilities, both at schema level as well as data level. In this section, we discuss some of the interesting aspects of the OdeView implementation. The following are the major ....

R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System", ACM Trans. Graphics 5, 2 (April 1986), 79-109.

....computing environments, the University of Michigan is growing such a system. While this growth is largely from the bottom up, we identified at an early date some of the major building blocks that are likely to prevail in the near and intermediate term: Macs, PCs, UNIX systems, Kerberos [1] X [2], AFS [3] and NFS [4] Unfortunately, our vision sometimes blurs when the security aspects of these systems are scrutinized. The security architecture of several widely used network based components has come into question in recent years, see e.g. 5, 6, 7, 8] but see also [9] While users ....

R.W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System," ACM Transactions on Graphics 5(2), pp. 79-109 (April, 1987).

....Compression (E = 17:84 (b) Fractal compression with Quad Tree (E = 14:62) MPEG: The MPEG video coding algorithm developed by Rowe et al. 60] at U C Berkeley was used in the experimental study. The MPEG video coding algorithm 52 is implemented in the C programming language on the X windows system [62]. The MPEG codec consists of a video coder which accepts an image sequence in YUV format and compresses each image as either an I, B or P frame as specified in a parameter file. Other parameters that can be changed are the number of frames in the GOP sequence, the quantization levels of each frame ....

R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System", ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 79-109, April 1986.

....responsible for making best use of the space it has been allocated. Different scenes allocate display space to component interactors using different algorithms. For example, a box tiles its components, but a tray allows them to overlap. We have implemented InterViews on top of the X window system[3]. A small set of primitive classes completely encapsulates the X interface. The remaining library classes and applications do not contain any X calls; they call operations defined by the primitives. 2 Class Organization Figure 1 shows a subset of the InterViews class hierarchy. Several factors ....

Scheifler, R.W., and J. Gettys, "The X Window System", ACM Transactions on Graphics Vol. 5, No. 2, April 1986, pp. 79-109.

....brought wide acceptance of the desktop metaphor and also led to the development of the Microsoft Windows system in the competing market for IBM PCs. In the Unix workstation domain, proprietary window systems and GUIs prevailed for a while. The industry eventually accepted the X Window System [12, 13, 14, 15] from MIT as an industry standard. One characteristic of Unix workstation users is that they are frequently developers, or hackers, who prefer the tool oriented metaphor over the desktop metaphor. Nevertheless, GUI standards such as Motif and Open Look have been developed to provide intuitive user ....

....[46] at Stanford University, Locus [47] at the University of California, Los Angeles, and Clouds [48] at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Other projects in distributed systems have evolved algorithms for distributed object management [49, 50, 51] 1. 3 The X Window System The X Window System [12, 13, 14, 15] has emerged as the de facto standard in the Unix workstation domain. It was developed in the early 1980s as part of project Athena at MIT. Portability was an early design concern in X Window since MIT was using a diverse group of computer workstations from different vendors. It was designed as a ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

R. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X window system," ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 5, pp. 79--109, April 1986.

....when tuning the program performance. However, accurate and complete profiles are difficult to arrive at for programs that follow the client server model of computing. In this model, which is followed by programs in the X Window 1 Submitted for publication Please do not distribute. 2 system [3, 4], the client programs request various services from servers by exchanging messages with them. In the client program, the routines that invoke the computation at the server are merely stub routines that send the appropriate request message to the server. The request may invoke substantial ....

....application with respect to the display server processing and the network communication overhead and identifies the contribution of each request type to this execution time. MESSAGES IN THE X WINDOW SYSTEM The X protocol supports a rich variety of message types for client server communication [5, 3]. There are, broadly speaking, four broad categories of messages, i.e. Requests , Replies , Events , and Errors . Request messages are sent by the client program to the display server to request various windowing and graphics functions. Replies are sent from the display server to the client ....

R. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X window system," ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 5, pp. 79--109, April 1986.

....which allows the programmers to better focus their efforts when tuning the program performance. However, accurate and complete profiles are difficult to arrive at for programs that follow the client server model of computing. In this model, which is followed by programs in the X Window 1 System [3, 4], the client programs request various services from servers by exchanging messages with them. In the client program, the routines that invoke the computation at the server are merely stub routines that send the appropriate request message to the server. The request may invoke substantial ....

....application with respect to the display server processing and the network communication overhead and identifies the contribution of each request type to this execution time. MESSAGES IN THE X WINDOW SYSTEM The X protocol supports a rich variety of message types for client server communication [5, 3]. There are, broadly speaking, four broad categories of messages, i.e. Requests , Replies , Events , and Errors . Request messages are sent by the client program to the display server to request various windowing and graphics functions. Replies are sent from the display server to the client ....

R. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X window system," ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 5, pp. 79--109, April 1986.

....concrete structure and button structure associations, and as reflected in the concrete content. The other point of intersection with proposed standards is in the visible hypertext level. Each visible HT segment and user display may be based around a protocol such as that of the X windows system [22]. Other de facto interface standards such as SunTools, OpenLook, Viewpoint, Motif, and NextStep are also applicable at this point. 5 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS There are many other hypertext systems that have not been discussed in detail in this paper. We now briefly return to specific ....

Robert W. Scheifler and Jim Gettys, `The X Window system', ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5(2), 79--109, (April 1986).

....networks, the personal computers will have difficulties handling the large amount of data present in a MIS, while the machines tailored for image processing don t perform other types of tasks with the same efficiency. The more general purpose Unix machines running the X window management system [SGN88] are better suited for handling large and diverse data volumes. They provide fast access to the disks and data can easily be distributed on a network. Furthermore, cheaper graphical terminals functioning as extra workstations can be connected to the server, making the services available to more ....

....system is considered to be the best choice given the currently available machine platforms at NERSC. B Software tools When implementing an MIS existing software tools will be utilized where this is feasible. The GUI (Graphical User Interface) will be implemented by means of the X Window System [SGN88] and Motif [H91] to make the system easy to port to other UNIX machines. Khoros [RY92] a public domain package containing both image processing software and facilities for specifying the user interface, can also be used. This package also uses X and Motif and will run on the same machines as ....

R.W. Scheifler, J. Gettys and R. Newman, "X WINDOW SYSTEM", Digital Press, 1988.

....application entities can be handled respectively. Section 8 will consider related work, and finally, Section 9 will describe experience and present conclusions. 2. System Architecture The Penguims system is implemented using approximately 21000 lines of C code and runs under the X window system [Sche86, McCo88] by means of the Artkit toolkit [Henr90] Figure 1 illustrates the major components of the system. The user visible components of the system include: a parser for a textual input language, a graphical user interface for an interactive specification environment, and a table driven application ....

....clearly indicate that actual screen update rather than the (incremental) update of cell values is to blame. Much of this problem can be traced to the overly simple redraw strategy of the toolkit used to implement the system along with the overall performance of the server based X window system [Sche86]. In conclusion, by making use of the properties that have made spreadsheets successful end user programming system and extending them in important new ways, the Penguims system provides an excellent environment for the rapid development of graphical user interfaces. The interactive programming ....

Scheifler, R. W. and Gettys J., "The X Window System", ACM Transactions on Graphics, v5, April 1986, pp. 79-109.

....environments, the University of Michigan is growing such a system. While this growth is largely from the bottom up, we identified at an early date some of the major building blocks that are likely to prevail in the near and intermediate term future: Macs, PCs, UNIX systems, Kerberos [1] X [2], AFS [3] and NFS [4] Unfortunately, our vision sometimes blurs when the security aspects of the system are scrutinized. The security architecture of several widely used network based components has come into question in recent years, see e.g. 5, 6, 7, 8] but see also [9] While users ....

R.W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System," ACM Transactions on Graphics 5(2), pp. 79-109 (April, 1987).

....commonly known object oriented programming language environment, offers an interactive graphical user interface with overlapping windows. The user is able to switch between parallel activities without being enclosed in an fixed dialog sequence ( modal free ) Alan Kay s user interface paradigm [7, 9] served as a basis for the Smalltalk integrated environment which discards the borderlines between application and operating system. Smalltalk was the model for many windowbased integrated environments and operating system level windowing systems (such as the X window system [9] These systems ....

....paradigm [7, 9] served as a basis for the Smalltalk integrated environment which discards the borderlines between application and operating system. Smalltalk was the model for many windowbased integrated environments and operating system level windowing systems (such as the X window system [9]) These systems have many properties and mechanisms in common. Therefore, the remainder considers special aspects of graphical editors and graphical programming languages. Because of the parallel representation in multiple windows, the problem of sharing common data and of consistency of the data ....

R.W. Scheifler, J. Gettys, "The X Window System", ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 5, No. 2, Apr. 1987, pp. 79-109

....for VUI and PUI specification, and communication between them. Another attempt towards the same goal is made in [92] Another area of research in this field, is best explained by Fresco [93] a distributed user interface development tool being built by the MIT X Consortium. The X Window system [94] provides network transparent access from an application to a user s display. However, X does not provide any convenient mechanism for distributing components within the user interface across a collection of machines. Fresco defines a new set of programming interfaces covering and expanding X ....

J.Gettys and R.W.Sheifler, "The X Window System," ACM Trans. Graphics, Vol.5, No.2, 1986, pp.79-109.

....had nearly identical home and work computing environments. The ################## UNIX is a Trademark of AT T Bell Laboratories. principal components of these computers are an IBM RT 115, a three MIPS computer with 12M of memory and a 70M disk, running Berkeley UNIX; the X Window System [1]; and Transarc s AFS (formerly, Carnegie Mellon University s Andrew File System) 2] The computers are dataless, i.e. the only files stored permanently on the local disk are those necessary for bootstrapping when the machine is turned on and some administrative applications. From work, ....

R.W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System," ACM Transactions on Graphics 5(2), pp. 79-109 (April, 1987).

No context found.

R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System", ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5(2), Apr. 1986.

No context found.

R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System," ACM Trans. Graphics, vol. 5, pp. 79--106, Apr. 1986.

No context found.

Scheifler, R. W. and Gettys, J., "The X Window System," ACM Trans. on Graphics 16:8 (Aug. 1983), pp. 57--69.

No context found.

Robert W. Scheifler and Jim Gettys. "The X Window System," ACM Transactions on Graphics. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 1986. 5(2). pp. 79-109.

No context found.

R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, `The X Window System', ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5, (2), 79--109 (1986).

No context found.

R. Scheifler and J. Gettys, `The X window system', ACM Trans. Graphics, 5, 79--109 (1986).

No context found.

Robert W. Scheifler and Jim Gettys, `The X Window system', ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5, (2), 79--109 (1986).

No context found.

R. W. Scheiffler and J. Gettys, `The X window system', ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5, (2), 79-- 109 (1986).

No context found.

Robert W. Scheifler and Jim Gettys, `The X window system', ACM Trans. on Graphics, 5 (2), 79--109 (1986).

No context found.

R. Scheifler and J. Gettys, `The X window system', ACM Trans. Graphics, 5, (2), 79--109 (1986).

No context found.

Robert W. Scheifler, and Jim Gettys, "The X Window System", ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5(2): 79-109, April 1986.

No context found.

Robert W. Scheifler, and Jim Gettys, "The X Window System", ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5(2): 79-109, April 1986.

No context found.

, 29-35. 91. Robert W. Scheifler and Jim Gettys. "The X Window System". ACM Transactions on Graphics 5, 2

No context found.

R. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System," ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 5, no. 2 (April 1986).

No context found.

R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System," ACM Transactions On Graphics 5(2), pp. 79-109 (April, 1987).

No context found.

R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System," ACM Transactions On Graphics 5(2), pp. 79-109 (April, 1987). -- --

No context found.

R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System," ACM Transactions On Graphics 5(2), pp. 79-109 (April, 1987).

No context found.

R. W. Scheifler and J. Gettys, "The X Window System," ACM Transactions On Graphics 5(2), pp. 79-109 (April, 1987). -- --

First 50 documents  Next 50

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC