| Miller, G.A., "The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information", The Psychological Review, 63, (1956), 81-97. |
....then iteratively recombining small building blocks to form larger and larger building blocks. In the process, the GA attempts to maintain a balance between exploration for new information and exploitation of existing information. 2. 2 Chunking in Soar Chunking was first proposed by Miller in [3] as a model for human memory. The idea of chunking as a learning theory was explored by Newell and Rosenbloom in [4] where they proposed the following Chunking Hypothesis: A human acquires and organizes knowledge of the environment by forming and storing expressions, called chunks, which are ....
G.A. Miller: "The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information", The Psychological Review, vol. 63, pp. 81-97, 1956.
....of a domain or the amount of interaction with other domains. One solution is to seek for relative measures. For instance, it is much easier to assign each module to one of five different complexity levels than to give an absolute complexity measure for each. A phenomenon that is also reported in [9]. Another difficulty is for the interviewees to abstract from their personal opinions or give answers beyond the scope of his her group. For instance, when asked the question How well understood is the domain of each module the answers sometimes reflected personal opinions (i.e. How well ....
Miller, G.A., "The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information", The Psychological Review, 1956, vol. 63, pp. 81-97
.... is motivated by the facts that humans naturally employ multimodal information channels for communication, and that multimodal interfaces have been demonstrated to be effective [1] Cognitive research has shown that multimodal communication results in an increased amount of transmitted information [2]. Therefore, multimodal interfaces facilitate more natural and efficient human computer interactions. One challenge in multimodal interface research is the lack of multimodal interface systems. Robust systems for applications such as speech recognition or gesture interpretation require long term ....
G. A. Miller, "The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information," The Psychological Review, vol. 63, pp. 81-97, 1956.
....negligible if the corresponding realistic granular degree of belief have granules of width 1=9. One can fit no more than 9 granules of such width in the interval [0; 1] This may explain why humans are most comfortable with 9 items to choose from the famous 7 plus minus 2 law; see, e.g. [7, 8]. This general psychological law has also been confirmed in our specific area of formalizing expert knowledge: namely, in [2] it was shown that this law explains why in intelligent control, experts normally use 9 different degrees (such as small , medium , etc. to describe the value of each ....
G. A. Miller, "The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information", Psychological Review, 1956, Vol. 63, pp. 81--97.
....negligible if the corresponding realistic granular degree of belief have granules of width 1=9. One can fit no more than 9 granules of such width in the interval [0; 1] This may explain why humans are most comfortable with 9 items to choose from the famous 7 plus minus 2 law; see, e.g. [21, 22]. 10 Reducing Computational Complexity of the Existing Techniques In addition to a purely mathematical problem of developing new techniques, we face the problem of decreasing the computational complexity of the corresponding algorithms. Most problems of optimization under uncertainty are ....
G. A. Miller, "The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information", Psychological Review, 1956, Vol. 63, pp. 81--97.
.... cognition from which the notion of meaning has been erased fails immediately and utterly when given the task of accounting for skillful everyday human activity, the information processing theory was surreptitiously tampered with, by the introduction of the obscure idea of chunking [MIL 53; MIL 56; SIM 74] Miller, for example, describes chunking as a process of organizing or grouping the input into familiar units or chunks, and a great deal of learning has gone into the formation of these familiar units. Since the memory span is a fixed number of chunks, we can increase the ....
....ultimately futile [JOH 86, p. 70] Again, in a sweeping review of the literature from 1993 Allport questions whether attention is a coherent field of study and whether any theoretical progress has been made in 25 years of research [ALL 93] George Miller is quite explicit about this [MIL 53; MIL 56] Emphasis added. Notice how dilligently Miller makes the number of bits of information the measure of familiarity and learning . computational model of human cognition. They just swapped paradigm whenever convenient. In fact, this confusion runs deep. The information processing ....
MILLER, GEORGE A.: `The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information,' Psychological Review, vol. 63, no. 2, March 1956, pp. 81-97.
....environments is an important application for this type of commonsense system. An example is provided of the performance of such a system against a standard regression forecaster on a sales forecasting task with noisy data. 1 Introduction Motivated by the apparent frugality of human reasoning [1, 2], this paper presents a commonsense reasoning system invoking summarisation. By summarisation we mean reduction of the size of a knowledge base (as measured, say, by the number of formula or the number of symbols) while conserving as much as possible of the information conveyed about the problem ....
....decisions, eg [23] in which they may overrule more analytically based advice and in which they do not use all available information. It is generally accepted that humans have limited capacity for dealing simultane ously with different concepts, as vividly described in Miller s famous paper [2]. In order to explain why human reasoning is successful in conditions of uncertainty and incompleteness, Gigerenzer Goldstein [1] investigated the performance of frugal problem solving algorithms that attempt only a partial representation of the situation and use approximate data. On a simple ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Miller, G. The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych Rev 101 (1994) 343-352(reprinted from Psychological Review, 63 (1956) 81-97).
....negligible if the corresponding realistic granular degree of belief have granules of width 1=9. One can fit no more than 9 granules of such width in the interval [0; 1] This may explain why humans are most comfortable with 9 items to choose from the famous 7 plus minus 2 law; see, e.g. [44], 45] D. Multi Level Granular Character of Uncertainty Reasoning Helps to Drastically Narrow Down the Class of Possible Logics These results cover both the logics in which the set of different degrees is an interval [0; 1] and more complex logics. D.1 [0; 1] Based Logics For numerical ....
G. A. Miller, "The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information", Psychological Review, Vol. 63, pp. 81--97, 1956.
No context found.
Miller, G.A., "The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information", The Psychological Review, 63, (1956), 81-97.
No context found.
G.A. Miller "The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information," The Psychological Review, 63(2), 1956, pp. 81-97
No context found.
George A. Miller, 1956, "The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information", Psychological Review, 63: 81-97.
No context found.
Z. Miller, G. A. 1956 . "The Magical Number Seven Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information," Psychological Re#iew 63, 81#97.
No context found.
Miller G. A., "The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information". Psychological Review, vol. 63, pp. 81-97, 1956
No context found.
G. A. Miller, "The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information," The Psychological Review, vol. 63, pp. 81--97, 1956. [Online]. Available: http://www.well.com/user/smalin/miller.html
No context found.
G. A. Miller, "The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information," The PsychologicalReview,vol.63,pp.81--97,1956.[Online].Available:http://www.well.com/user/smalin/miller.html
No context found.
Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
No context found.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
No context found.
G. A. Miller, "The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information," Psychological Review, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 81--97, 1956.
No context found.
Miller, George A. The Magical Number Seven Plus or Minus Two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, vol. 63, pages 81-87, 1956.
No context found.
G. Miller, "The Magical Number Seven Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information," Psychological Review 63 (1956) pp. 81-97, cited in [5]
No context found.
Miller, G.A. "The Magical Number Seven: Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information," Psychological Review, (63), March 1956, pp. 81-97.
No context found.
G. Miller. The magical number seven plus or minus two; some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63:81-97, 1956.
No context found.
G. A. Miller, "The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information," The Psychological Review, vol. 63, pp. 81-97, 1956.
No context found.
G. Miller. The magical number seven plus or minus two; some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63:81-97, 1956.
No context found.
Miller, G.A., "The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information", Psychology Review, American Psycholo9y Associati, Inc., Vol 63, No. 2, March 1956.
First 50 documents Next 50
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC