| M. Grossglauser and K. K. Ramakrshnan, \SEAM: Scalable and ecient ATM multicast, " in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '97, (Kobe, Japan), April 1997. |
....how the MC is established and maintained. A number of multicast protocols have been proposed for use in the Internet, including the DVMRP [19] MOSPF [17] CBT [3] and PIM [7] For ATM networks, a relatively simple form of MC is described in [1] although other protocols are under consideration [11, 16]. In an important class of multicast protocols, called core based forwarding (CBF) protocols, a core node is associated with each multicast group. The topology of the multicast tree, shared by the group, is de ned to be the union of the member to core shortest paths. Messages destined for the ....
M. Grossglauser and K. K. Ramakrshnan, \SEAM: Scalable and ecient ATM multicast, " in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '97, (Kobe, Japan), April 1997.
....that the MCS must be present after migration since without a MCS in the current network the receiver maybe forced to connect to its previous MCS which maybe far away. Another method for MTM communication currently under investigation is the use of a single shared VC for both receiving and sending [81]. This means that shared tree approach (e.g. CBT [64] can be employed in ATM networks where multicast group members only need to setup a connection to the core for sending receiving data. The main problem with this approach is cell interleaving from multiple sources at merge point. The core is ....
M. Grossglauser and K. K. Ramakrishnan, \SEAM:scalable and ecient ATM multicast," in Proceedings of INFOCOM'97, (Kobe, Japan), Apr. 1997.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC