C.R. Lin and K-M. Wang., "Mobile Multicast Support in IP Networks", In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'00, Tel Aviv, Israel, March 2000. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Mobility and Multicast: Protocol Design and Analysis - Vida, Costa, Fdida (Correct)
....requirement. On the other hand, a growing number of applications (Internet TV, videoconferencing, distributed games and simulations) are based on multicast distribution. There are two traditional solutions to handle host mobility in IP multicast: remote subscription and bidirectional tunneling [7, 8, 12, 16]. Each of these solutions has its drawbacks. Remote subscription is not efficient for highly mobile receivers, as it requires frequent grafts and prunes of branches in the multicast distribution tree. Moreover, in case of source mobility for a source based multicast tree, not only branches, but ....
C.R. Lin and K-M. Wang., "Mobile Multicast Support in IP Networks", In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'00, Tel Aviv, Israel, March 2000.
M-HBH - Efficient Mobility Management in Multicast - Vida, Costa, Fdida (Correct)
....The first one is bi directional tunneling (BT) it builds a tunnel between the home network and the foreign network of the mobile node. The second one is remote subscription (RS) and is based on the tree reconfiguration that takes into account the new location of the mobile node. Hybrid solutions [8, 10] may switch from one technique to the other, depending on specific criteria. We propose a novel approach, the Mobile Hop By Hop multicast routing protocol (M HBH) based on HBH [5] The recursive unicast addressing approach of M HBH is well suited to source or receiver mobility as it reduces ....
....to the mobile nodes currently in that network. Only the DMSP tunnels data to the foreign network. A drawback of MoM (and bi directional tunneling in general) is that the tunnel from the DMSP (or from any HA) to the foreign network can be long. The Range Based Mobile Multicast protocol (RBMoM) [10] uses multicast home agents with a limited service range to alleviate this problem. 2.3. Hop By Hop Multicast Routing (HBH) The HBH protocol [5] was designed with the problem of progressive deployment in mind. It uses a recursive unicast technique and two routing tables: a Multicast Control ....
C.R. Lin and K-M. Wang, Mobile Multicast Support in IP Networks, in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'00, Tel Aviv, Israel, March 2000.
A Survey of Multicast Technologies - Roca, Costa, Vida, Dracinschi, Fdida (2000) (1 citation) (Correct)
....the routing path may be far from optimal as all the trac goes through the mobile s home agent. Besides, when several mobile hosts having subscribed to the same multicast group are visiting the same foreign network, a copy of each packet is sent to this foreign network To improve the situation [36] introduces a new multicast home agent (MHA) This MHA remains the same as long as the mobile roams in the MHA s service range. If out of range, the MHA is moved to a location closer to the mobile s current position. This is a good solution to nd a balance between eciency and multicast tree ....
C.R. Lin and K-M. Wang. Mobile multicast support in ip networks. In IEEE INFOCOM'00, March 2000.
An Investigation into The Application of Active Networks to Mobile .. - Chin (2000) (4 citations) (Correct)
....packets directed towards the MH (such as negative acknowledgements (NACKS) might not be forwarded correctly and reconstruction of the tree each time the MH migrates is inecient. An approach called RBMoM which encompasses both bi directional HA and remote subscription was presented by Lin et al. [73]. Their idea is based on having a multicast home agent (MHA) Instead of tunneling through the HA, the MHA is responsible for delivery of multicast packets to the MH. Unlike bidirectional HA, where the HA s position is xed, the MHA assigned to the MH changes as the MH moves out of the MHA s ....
....multicast approaches is presented. The category Join and graft delays refers to the time it takes for receivers to rejoin the multicast session. For Bi HA and MoM the join delay is dependent on the receiver s distance from its HA. As for RBMoM the join delay is range dependent. As mentioned in [73], the worst case and ideal performance of their scheme is that of Bi HA and Rebuild respectively. In AMTree, the join latency is dependent on the distance to the previous BS. Since migration is generally local, the rejoin process incurs minimal delay. Note that in AMTree the second rejoin process ....
C. R. Lin and K.-M. Wang, \Mobile multicast support in IP networks," in INFOCOM '2000, 2000.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC