Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993a). Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 517-535.  Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
A Computational Level Theory of Similarity - Love (2000) (Correct)
.... (i.e. have different time courses and differentially affect perceived similarity) than commonalities (or matches) that are not in correspondence [8] Likewise, differences that can be put into correspondence are psychologically distinct from differences that cannot be put into correspondence [15]. Humans are also sensitive to higher level matches (i.e. compatibility relations) as in the solar system atom example. Analogs are perceived as similar when they have a common relational structure. The# term captures this type of similarity and it is high when elements from one analog map to ....
MARKMAN, A. B., AND GENTNER, D. Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language 32 (1993), 517--535.
Reconciling Fine-Grained Lexical Knowledge and Coarse-Grained .. - Edmonds, Hirst (2000) (Correct)
....: No word has a value that can be identified independently of what else is in its vicinity. Contrary to what one might expect that the more similar two items are the easier it is to represent their differences, which is one interpretation of Markman and Gentner s work on similarity (Markman Gentner 1993; Gentner Markman 1994) there is actually remarkable complexity in the differences between near synonyms. Consider the full complexity of the usage note in figure 1. Not only do the nearsynonyms differ in the expression of different concepts and ideas, such as misconception and ....
Markman, A. B., and Gentner, D. 1993. Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language 32:517--535.
Similarity in Context - Goldstone (1997) (7 citations) Self-citation (Gentner) (Correct)
No context found.
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993a). Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 517-535.
Telling juxtapositions: Using repetition and alignable.. - Ferguson, Forbus (1998) (2 citations) Self-citation (Gentner) (Correct)
....differences) This model predicts that increasing the similarity of two concepts also increases the number of alignable differences noticed. This prediction was borne out in their experiments. When human participants were asked to list differences between high and low similarity word pairs (Markman Gentner, 1993), participants consistently listed more alignable differences for pairs with high similarity (hotels Figure 2: Stylized redrawing of Figure 1 Figure 3: Regularity found by MAGI and motels) than for pairs with low similarity (magazine and kitten) A second set of experiments (Markman Gentner, ....
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(4), 517-535.
Comparison and Choice: Relations between . . . - Medin (1995) (Correct)
No context found.
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993a). Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 517-535.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC