| S. Sen, A. Biswas, and S. Debnath. Believing others: Pros and cons. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 279 285, 2000. |
....number of both theoretical and empirical attempts 33 to achieve this. For example, Zacharia et al. 168] develop a collaborative reputation mechanism that offers personalised evaluations for the various ratings (assigned to users) to predict their reliabilities in an e commerce context. Sen et al. [130] consider sharing other agents opinions as a means of curbing the exploitative tendencies of selfish agents. To avoid the problems caused by believing other agents, they developed a learned trust based evaluation function that can resist both individual and concerted deception on the part of ....
S. Sen, A. Biswas, and S. Debnath. Believing others: Pros and cons. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 279 285, 2000.
....the impact of different beliefs on the outcomes of a basic on line negotiation scenario. Our approach directly models the mental beliefs and examines their impact on the outcomes. Bazzan and Bordini [1] studied the impact of agents personalities on outcomes of the Minority Game. Sen et al.[6] examined a probabilistic strategy, which can be interpreted as the agent s beliefs about other agents, used by an agent to help others in a not perfectly friendly environment. Gmytrasiewicz and Lisetti [4] directly modeled an agent s mental emotion as a probability distribution over the ....
Sandip Sen, Anish Biswas and Sandip Debnath. Believing others: Pros and Cons. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on MulitAgent Systems, pages 279-285, Boston, MA, July 2000.
....of a basic on line negotiation scenario. Our approach, directly model the mental beliefs and examine their impact on the outcomes, is shared by other researchers in multiagent systems. Bazzan and Bordini [2000] studied the impact of agents personalities on outcomes of the Minority Game. Sen et al. 2000] examined a probabilistic strategy, which can be interpreted as the agent s beliefs about other agents, used by an agent to help others in a not perfectlyfriendly environment. Gmytrasiewicz and Lisetti [2000] directly modeled an agent s mental emotion as a probability distribution over the ....
Sandip Sen, Anish Biswas and Sandip Debnath. Believing others: Pros and Cons. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on MulitAgent Systems, pages 279-285, Boston, MA, July 2000.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC