| Padget, J., Nuyens, G., and Bretthauer, H. (eds.). An overview of EuLisp. (1993). In this issue. |
....obtained as part of the APPLY project. The aim of the project is to develop a modern and practical Lisp system [3] Efficiency and integration can only be reached in line with corresponding demands on language. These include the following features, that are complied with by the Lisp dialect EuLisp [11]. ffl separately compiled modules, ffl clear separation between compile time and run time, ffl far reaching static analysis, ffl separation of language from development environment. Hence, we decided to build a module and application compiler for EuLisp In order to achieve compiled modules ....
Padget, J., Nuyens, G., and Bretthauer, H. (eds.). An overview of EuLisp. (1993). In this issue.
....of use than it is by the structure of the implementation. This is particularly well illustrated by the comparison between two MOPs for ostensibly similar domains CLOS and Telos. As discussed above, CLOS is the object system for Common Lisp; Telos, similarly, is the object system for EuLisp (Padget et al. 1993). Like CLOS, Telos incorporates a metaobject protocol by which programmers can make changes to the internal behaviour of the object system. The design histories and overall goals of EuLisp and Common Lisp (and hence, Telos and CLOS) are quite different in particular, EuLisp and Telos were ....
Padget, J., Nuyens, G., and Bretthauer, H. (1993). "An Overview of EuLisp", Lisp and Symbolic Computation, 6(1/2), pp. 9--98.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC