H. Evans. Why Object Serialization is Inappropriate for Providing Persistence in Java. Technical report, Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, 2000. In Preparation. Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
A Review of the Rationale and Architectures of PJama: a.. - Atkinson, Jordan (2000) (Correct)
....versions of their distributed software architecture, DRASTIC, on the PJama platform [82] and an evaluation of their experience is given in [83] This mainly concerns distribution and persistence. The very significant benefit of orthogonal persistence over Java Object Serialization is reported in [81], a view endorsed by David Jordan [115] Web Server: At Glasgow we have been building up a bioinformatics service and have needed a web server and a way of running Java Servlets so that they could access PJama stores. Initially we tried converting JigSaw [214] but found that its whole structure ....
H. Evans. Why Object Serialization is Inappropriate for Providing Persistence in Java. Technical report, Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, 2000. In Preparation.
Defining and Handling Transient Fields in PJama - Printezis, Atkinson, Jordan (Correct)
....frameworks are very high profile and widely used, JOS has effectively become the default persistence mechanism for the Java platform [19] We believe that there are numerous problems with using JOS as a persistence mechanism for productionquality code. These are presented in detail by Evans [10] 7 Ken Arnold of Sun Microsystems, personal communication. and Jordan [17] and they are beyond the scope of this paper. We will concentrate instead on the transient keyword in the context of JOS. 4.2.1 The transient Keyword and JOS For reasons similar to the ones presented in Section 3, a way ....
....Examples of the latter are more subtle. However they do exist in the internals of PJRMI, the PJama specific extensions to RMI [29] Given the above, we believe that any definition of transience should deal with the persistence distribution separation (Evans also reaches the same conclusion [10]) Ideally, in an orthogonally persistent system, JOS should only be used in the context of RMI and not to provide any persistence facilities. In this case, the proposed serial and storage sub modifiers will be interpreted as not transmittable and not persistent, respectively. 12 Thanks to Alex ....
H. Evans. Why Object Serialization is Inappropriate for Providing Persistence in Java. Technical report, Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Scotland, 1999. In Preparation.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC