Finn, T., Labrou, Y., and Mayfield, J. KQML as an agent communication language, Software Agents, MIT Press, 1997.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....of the agent. Changes to goals utility values result in pre empting some plans and initiating new plans. Execution of plans a#ects the environment which in turn changes the beliefs, and so on. Agent communicate with each other through agent communication performatives such as FIPA [4] or KQML [7], or shared blackboards as in Linda or its extensions [18] Figure 1 shows the conceptual model of our framework. We introduce Agent Goal Diagram (AGD) to model the relationships between the goals and the environment, the Use Case Goal Diagram (UCGD) to relate use cases and goals, Agent Domain ....

....enforces the BDI model but also provides the flexibility for implementing application specific behavior, including re using an existing design or implementation. In general, beliefs may be shared and modified by other agents. This can be achieved either by direct communication using KQML [7] or FIPA ACL [4] messages, shared knowledge bases or blackboards (e.g. Linda or its extensions such as LIME [18] Goals can be proactive or reactive proactive goals reflect the desires of an agent. These goals may impact how an agent reacts to external events (including the possibility of ....

T.Finn,Y.Labrou and J.Mayfield, "KQML as an agent communication language," in Software Agents, edited by J.Bradshaw, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1977.

....For a more detailed and formal treatment the reader is referred to any of the numerous publications on BDI (for example, 11 13] In general beliefs may be shared and modified by other agents. This can be achieved either by direct communication (using Knowledge Query Manipulation Language KQML [4] messages) using shared knowledge bases or blackboards (for example using Linda or extensions to Linda such as LIME [7] 9] Plans can be proactive or reactive proactive plans reflect the desires or goals of an agent. These goals may impact how an agent reacts to external events (including ....

....that goals are triggered when belief values change. The changes can be either due to external triggers, messages from other agents or changes to a knowledge base. 7. Compound Statements for describing a plan can include any programming language statement. It is straightforward to include KQML [4] messages in our language structure, since a Compound Statement of a plan can be a KQML statement. KQML represents communication among agents. The communication is typically for one of the following purposes (we can map these to KQML performatives) Assert a Belief value. This could be either ....

T. Finn, Y. Labrou and J.Mayfield. "KQML as an agent communication language", in Software Agents, edited by J. Bradshaw, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1977.

....they may represent human users in the community or resources such as servers and printers. Agents communicate with each other in a language called LARKS. The semantics of each message is closely related to agent communication languages such as Knowledge Query and Manipulation Language (KQML) [6] and Agent Commmunication Language developed by the Foundation of Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA ACL) 3] When the user of a system desires to locate a resource, he creates a logical statement that contains keywords that may describe the resource and the system will automatically match the ....

T. Finn, Y. Labrou, and J. Mayfield. Kqml as an agent communication language. Technical report, Proceedings of the 4th Internation Conference and Exhibition on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agents, 1999.

....Mobile Agents in ####### ####### [12]isanagent based middleware framework for processing and distributing complex tasks. In general, the ####### framework provides an infrastructure for mobile agents whichmay access services of any kind. Each ####### agent communicates by passing messages in KQML [7]. The key design goals in ####### are the support of highly distributed applications within computer networks and high level interfaces for the integration of various services, for example services for distributed symbolic computations. 3.1.1 Agents In ####### there are two kinds of agents: ....

T. Finn, Y. Labrou, and J. May eld. KQML as an Agent Communication Language. In J. Bradshaw, editor, SoftwareAgents, pages 291-316. MIT Press, 1997.

.... of agents that exhibit social behavior and are capable of interacting with each other in a co operative fashion (Durfee and Rosenschein, 1994) while simultaneously each agent may pursue individual objectives (Ferber, 1993) This interaction assumes some kind of communication language (e.g. KQML (Finn et al. 1997)) and perception of the surrounding environment. The use of a multi agent architecture will make the decisions to be taken in a decentralized way (Kouiss et al. 1997) Agent based systems are best suited for applications that are modular, decentralized, changeable, ill structured and complex ....

Finn, T.; Labrou, Y. and Mayfield, J. (1997) KQML as an agent communication language. In: Software Agents. Bradshaw, J. (Ed.) AAAI Press/MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-52234-9.

No context found.

Finn, T., Labrou, Y., and Mayfield, J. KQML as an agent communication language, Software Agents, MIT Press, 1997.

No context found.

T. Finn, Y. Labrou, and J. May eld. KQML as an Agent Communication Language. In J. Bradshaw, editor, Software Agents, pages 291-316. MIT Press, 1997.

No context found.

Finn, T., Labrou, Y., Mayfield, J. (1997). KQML as an Agent Communication Language

No context found.

T. Finn, Y. Labrou, and J. Mayfield, KQML as an Agent Communication Language, in (J.M. Bradshaw, ed.), Software Agents, MIT Press, 1997, pp. 291--316.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC