| A.F. Dragoni and P. Giorgini. Revising beliefs received from multiple source. In Frontiers of Belief Revision, M. A. Williams and H. Rott, eds., Applied Logic. Kluwer, 2000. |
....of new information into a knowledge base such that the new knowledge base is consistent. The belief revision problem we consider has been called consolidation by Hansson [10] Other authors in the belief revision field have considered the problem of updating the knowledge in a multiagent system. [8] considers the case of an agent that has to update its knowledge base with information coming from di#erent sources: in this case the agent must be able to assign a di#erent credibility to the di#erent sources. We consider as well the problem of knowledge updating from multiple sources (the other ....
A. Dragoni and P. Giorgini. Revising beliefs received from multiple source, 1999.
No context found.
A.F. Dragoni and P. Giorgini. Revising beliefs received from multiple source. In Frontiers of Belief Revision, M. A. Williams and H. Rott, eds., Applied Logic. Kluwer, 2000.
No context found.
A.F. Dragoni and P. Giorgini. Revising beliefs received from multiple source. In M A Williams and H Rott, editors, Frontiers of Belief Revision, Applied Logic. Kluwer, 2001. 11
No context found.
A.F. Dragoni and P. Giorgini. Revising beliefs received from multiple source. In Frontiers of Belief Revision, M. A. Williams and H. Rott, eds., Applied Logic. Kluwer, 2000.
No context found.
A.F. Dragoni and P. Giorgini. Revising beliefs received from multiple source. In M A Williams and H Rott, editors, Frontiers of Belief Revision, Applied Logic. Kluwer, 2001. 11
....will be related to the ordering on the ABEs. Abductive Revision The operation of revision, denoted by , is applied when X explains something which is inconsistent with an observation in a context : X : 4 = X : This operative de nition comes from the Levi identity (see [9, 7]) 6 Updating mental states from communication In this section we formally characterize the methods for updating the hearer s image of the speaker s mental state as a consequence of receipt of the speech acts INFORM and REQUEST. 6.1 Updating from INFORM Checking preconditions (condition I4) ....
A.F. Dragoni and P. Giorgini. Revising beliefs received from multiple source. In M A Williams and H Rott, editors, Frontiers of Belief Revision, Applied Logic. Kluwer, 1999.
....Revision The operation of revision, denoted by , must be performed when X explains something which is inconsistent with the observation. For any formula in a context , we define the operator: X : X : The definition of this operation comes from the Levi s identity (see [7, 5]) 6 Update from INFORM Checking preconditions (Condition I4) Let us suppose that s performs INFORM(s; h; Being aware of the fact that condition I4 holds, h may update its image of the speaker s mental state by imposing that the precondition of INFORM(s; h; holds on its images of ....
A.F. Dragoni and P. Giorgini. Revising beliefs received from multiple source. In M A Williams and H Rott, editors, Frontiers of Belief Revision, Applied Logic. Kluwer, 2000.
No context found.
A.F. Dragoni and P. Giorgini. Revising beliefs received from multiple source. In M A Williams and H Rott, editors, Frontiers of Belief Revision, Applied Logic. Kluwer, 1999.
....Abductive Revision The operation of revision, denoted by , must be performed when X explains something which is inconsistent with the observation. For any formula in a context , we define the operator: X : X : This operative definition comes from the Levi identity (see [6, 5]) 6 Update from INFORM Checking preconditions (Condition I4) Let us suppose that s performs INFORM(s; h; Being aware of the fact that condition I4 holds, h may update its image of the speaker s mental state by imposing that the precondition of INFORM(s; h; holds on its images of ....
A.F. Dragoni and P. Giorgini. Revising beliefs received from multiple source. In M A Williams and H Rott, editors, Frontiers of Belief Revision, Applied Logic. Kluwer, 1999.
No context found.
A. Dragoni and P. Giorgini. Revising beliefs received from multiple source. In M. Williams and H. Rott, editors, Frontiers of Belief Revision, Applied Logic. Kluwer, 1999.
No context found.
A. Dragoni and P. Giorgini. Revising beliefs received from multiple source. In M.A. Williams and H. Rott, editors, Frontiers of Belief Revision, Applied Logic. Kluwer, 1999.
No context found.
A. Dragoni and P. Giorgini. Revising beliefs received from multiple source. In M.A. Williams and H. Rott, editors, Frontiers of Belief Revision, Applied Logic. Kluwer, 1999.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC