| A. Revel, P. Gaussier, S. Leprtre, and JP. Banquet, "Planification versus sensorymotor conditioning: what are the issues ?," in From Animals to Animats : Simulation of Adaptive Behavior SAB'98, 1998, pp. 129--138. |
....goal. Since the maps store only the locations of walls, this system cannot be extended to the construction task. The PerAc (Perception Action) architecture presented in (Gaussier and Zrehen, 1995) allows learning of sensory motor associations. The reflex system is innate as in our architecture. In (Revel et al. 1998), a spatial map is added to the PerAc architecture. This spatial map is again in the form of a graph where each node represents a region and the arcs denote the topological relationship between regions. Though this architecture can handle more than one goal, there is no mechanism by which ....
Revel, A., Gaussier, P., Lepretre, S., and Banquet, J. P. (1998). Planification versus sensory-motor conditioning: what are the issues? In From Animals to Animats 5.
No context found.
A. Revel, P. Gaussier, S. Leprtre, and JP. Banquet, "Planification versus sensorymotor conditioning: what are the issues ?," in From Animals to Animats : Simulation of Adaptive Behavior SAB'98, 1998, pp. 129--138.
.... during exploration, what is only possible is to learn what movement is possible to reach or to leave this place while during planning what is interesting is to know which movements are allowed from a given place, and, among them, choosing which is the best one to reach the goal (see [15] for details) We thus need to learn something linking at the same time the departure position, the arrival position and the movement to be performed to go from one to the other. A solution consists in building a representation of the transition between two situations. Let AB, the internal ....
....of the transition between A and B. The associated action (the movement allowing to go from A to B) can be learned using, for instance, a probabilistic conditioning rule (see [8] for details) During planning, a motivation backpropagation mechanism (use of the cognitive map to plan [15]) activates the neuron indicating the movement that it is necessary to perform in order to reach the goal. The systems learns to predict the possible transition(s) from the current scene. The idea of learning to predict transitions comes from a collaboration with a neurobiologist on modelling the ....
A. Revel, P. Gaussier, S. Lepretre, and J.P. Banquet. Planification versus sensory-motor conditioning: what are the issues ? In SAB'98, pages 129--138, 1998.
....to learn. With our PerAc architecture, the robot can take for free the environment continuity properties that are lost in symbolic systems. The addition of planning capabilities is also required to allow latent learning and to quickly find the shortest pathway solution to a particular problem (Revel et al. 1998). However, the PerAc architecture does not help to solve problems which have an intrinsically high dimension. Box 1: The PerAc architecture The PerAc (Perception Action) block has been proposed as an elementary generic brick of neuronal computation (Albus, 1991; Brooks, 1986; Hecht Nielsen, ....
Revel, A., P.Gaussier, Lepretre, S., & Banquet, J.P. 1998 (August). Planification versus sensory-motor conditioning: what are the issues ? In: Accepted to SAB 98. SAB, Zurich.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC