| J. Johannsen. Equational calculi and constant-depth propositional proofs. In P. Beame and S. Buss, editors, Proof Complexity and Feasible Arithmetics, volume 39. AMS DIMACS Series, 1998. |
.... : The correctness of PTK is obvious, and the completeness follows from Theorem 1 below and the completeness of PTK. In the following, we show that PTK and PTK are polynomially equivalent, and that the mutual simulations also respect the depth of proofs. This was claimed without proof in [3], where PTK was rst de ned. Theorem 1. If P is a proof in PTK, then there is a proof P 0 in PTK of the same end sequent. The size of P 0 is linear in the size of P , and the formula depths of P and P 0 are the same. Proof. Each application of the rule T n k right is replaced by a ....
J. Johannsen. Equational calculi and constant-depth propositional proofs. In P. Beame and S. R. Buss, editors, Proof Complexity and Feasible Arithmetics, pages 149-162. AMS DIMACS Series Vol. 39, 1998. 8
No context found.
J. Johannsen. Equational calculi and constant-depth propositional proofs. In P. Beame and S. Buss, editors, Proof Complexity and Feasible Arithmetics, volume 39. AMS DIMACS Series, 1998.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC