R. Gill, "Critique of `Elements of quantum probability' ", in Quantum Probability Communications XI., ed. R.L. Hudson and J.M. Lindsay, World Scientific (1996), Singapore. Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
PRAMANA c fl Indian Academy of Sciences Vol. 54, No. ? - Journal Of February (Correct)
....[1] states categorically: The new phenomena do not force violations of classical probability theory or logic. On the other hand, Kummerer and Maassen [2] discuss . polarization experiments which show the need to extend classical probability theory. This claim is explicitly denied by Gill [3], who takes these authors to task: though quantum reality is strange, classical probability [is] perfectly adequate to describe it. In fact the dissension is not as serious as it seems. A distinction can be made between what is required on the one hand and what is useful on the other, as ....
R. Gill, "Critique of `Elements of quantum probability' ", in Quantum Probability Communications XI., ed. R.L. Hudson and J.M. Lindsay, World Scientific (1996), Singapore.
Nonlocality Is A Nonsequitur - David Atkinson Institute (Correct)
....categorically: The new phenomena do not force violations of classical probability theory or logic. On the other hand, K timmerer and Maassen [Kiimmerer 1996] discuss . polarization experiments which show the need to extend classical probability theory. This claim is explicitly denied by Gill [Gill 1996], who takes these authors to task: though quantum reality is strange, classical probability [is] perfectly adequate to describe it. In fact the dissension is not as serious as it seems. A distinction can be made between what is required on the one hand and what is convenient on the ....
R. Gill, "Critique of'Elements of quantum probability' ", in Quantum Probability Communications XI., ed. R.L. Hudson and J.M. Lindsay, World Scientific, Singapore.
Bell's Inequalities and Kolmogorov's Axioms - Atkinson (2000) (Correct)
....[1] states categorically: The new phenomena do not force violations of classical probability theory or logic. On the other hand, Kummerer and Maassen [2] discuss . polarization experiments which show the need to extend classical probability theory. This claim is explicitly denied by Gill [3], who takes these authors to task: though quantum reality is strange, classical probability [is] perfectly adequate to describe it. In fact the dissension is not as serious as it seems. A distinction can be made between what is required on the one hand and what is useful on the other, as ....
R. Gill, "Critique of `Elements of quantum probability' ", in Quantum Probability Communications XI., ed. R.L. Hudson and J.M. Lindsay, World Scientific (1996), Singapore.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC