Goldrick, Matt. 1998. Optimal opacity: Covert structure in phonology. Ms., Johns Hopkins University. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Turbid Output Representations and the Unity of Opacity - Goldrick (2000) Self-citation (Goldrick) (Correct)
....is similar to the ASSIMILATE constraint: segments which are projecting as nuclei in adjacent syllables must be Projected to by the same [back, front] features. Note that UMLAUT is stated over the Projection relation; this is consistent with the Turbid characterization of long distance spreading (Goldrick, 1998). Matthew Goldrick 12 As shown by .br. ig. normal application can occur following Level II affixation. This is expected under the Turbid account: overapplication of assimilation is triggered by output relationships, so changes in the output of the derived form (as compared to the base ....
....What sets Turbidity apart from these approaches is its generality. By distinguishing between Projection and Pronunciation relations for all phonological associations, Turbidity aims for a general approach to opacity effects. Here, we have analyzed moraic segmental and syllablic segmental opacity. Goldrick (1998) and Goldrick Smolensky (1999) analyze additional Turbid relations between features and segments (with respect to transparency in vowel harmony) and tones and segments (examining OCP effects in Mituku) Turbidity holds the promise of bringing a wide range of opacity effects into the family of ....
Goldrick, M. (1998). Optimal opacity: Covert structure in phonology. Ms., Johns Hopkins University.
Transparency, Strict Locality, and Targeted Constraints - Eric Bakovic And (Correct)
No context found.
Goldrick, Matt. 1998. Optimal opacity: Covert structure in phonology. Ms., Johns Hopkins University.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC