| Rescher, N., 1966. The Logic of Commands, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. |
....A restricted general obligation indicates that for every person in a group the obligation holds. e.g. Cyclists have to give way to motorvehicles That a restricted generalized obligation is di erent from a collective obligation can be seen easily from the following example, taken from Rescher ([19]) John and Paul are obliged that the table is moved across the room. If John alone accomplishes that the table is moved across the room, then the group (John and Paul) satis es the norm, i.e. the obligation that the table is moved across the room. It does not follow from the obligation that ....
Rescher, N., The Logic of Commands, Dover, New York, 1966.
....A restricted general obligation indicates that for every person in a group the obligation holds. e.g. Cyclists have to give way to motorvehicles That a restricted generalized obligation is different from a collective obligation can be seen easily from the following example, taken from Rescher ([19]) John and Paul are obliged that the table is moved across the room. If John alone accomplishes that the table is moved across the room, then the group (John and Paul) satisfies the norm, i.e. the obligation that the table is moved across the room. It does not follow from the obligation that ....
Rescher, N., The Logic of Commands, Dover, New York, 1966.
No context found.
Rescher, N., 1966. The Logic of Commands, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
No context found.
Rescher, N., The Logic of Commands, Dover, New York, 1966.
No context found.
Rescher, Nicholas (1966), The Logic of Commands (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; New York: Dover).
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC