D. Bailey, J. Barton, T. Lasinski, and H. Simon. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks. Technical Report RNR-91002, NASA Ames Research Center, 1991. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
First 50 documents Next 50
Performance Evaluation of the SX6 Vector.. - Oliker, Canning.. (Correct)
....We begin by evaluating low level system characteristics using microbenchmarks. Specifically, we measure memory bandwidth for various data access patterns, interprocessor MPI communication speeds, and OpenMP thread overheads. Next, we evaluate six of the well known NAS Parallel Benchmarks (NPB) [13]. Finally, we present performance results for numerical codes from scientific computing domains, including astrophysics, fusion energy, materials science, fluid dynamics, and molecular dynamics. Our tests encompass a wide spectrum of algorithms, and multiple programming paradigms and ....
....showed little degradation in performance with increasing numbers of processors. Unfortunately, the same was not generally true for the Power3 4, where the per processor performance on fully loaded SMP nodes deteriorated significantly. 4 Scientific Kernels: NPB The NAS Parallel Benchmarks (NPB) [13] provide a good middle ground for evaluating the performance of compact, well understood applications. The NPB were created at a time when vector machines were considered no longer 5 cost effective, and although their performance was meant to be good across a whole range of systems, they were ....
D.H. Bailey et al. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks. Technical Report RNR-94-007, NASA Ames Research Center, 1994.
An Evaluation of High Performance Fortran - Compilers Using The (Correct)
....When running in parallel, codes compiled under pghpf scale from slightly to significantly better than when compiled under xlhpf. The di#erence is mainly from better performance of communications such as cshift, spread, sum and gather scatter under pghpf. While numerous benchmarking packages [15, 6, 1, 2, 10] have been developed for measuring supercomputer performance, we are aware of only two that evaluate HPF compilers. The NAS parallel benchmarks [1] were first developed as paper and pencil benchmarks that specify the task to be performed and allow the implementor to choose algorithms as well as ....
....better performance of communications such as cshift, spread, sum and gather scatter under pghpf. While numerous benchmarking packages [15, 6, 1, 2, 10] have been developed for measuring supercomputer performance, we are aware of only two that evaluate HPF compilers. The NAS parallel benchmarks [1] were first developed as paper and pencil benchmarks that specify the task to be performed and allow the implementor to choose algorithms as well as programming model, though an HPF implementation has been developed recently. The NAS parallel benchmarks consist of only a few benchmarks which are ....
D. Bailey, et. al. The NAS parallel benchmarks. Technical Report RNR-94-007, NASA Ames Research Center, Mo#ett Field, California, March 1994.
Evaluation of Cache-based Superscalar and.. - Oliker, Carter.. (2003) (2 citations) (Correct)
....SX6 vector processor against the cache based IBM Power3 and Power4 architectures for several key scientific computing areas. We begin by evaluating memory bandwidth and MPI communication speeds, using a set of microbenchmarks. Next, we evaluate three of the well known NAS Parallel Benchmarks (NPB) [4, 11], using problem size Class B. Finally, we present performance results for several numerical codes from scientific computing domains, including astrophysics, plasma fusion, fluid dynamics, magnetic fusion, and molecular dynamics. Since most modern scientific codes are already tuned for cache based ....
....test case, the SX6 performance degrades precipitously and is slightly exceeded by the Power4. 4 2 17.1 6.7 5.0 4 31.7 12.1 7. 1 8 54.4 19.8 22.0 16 79.1 28.9 32 42.4 Table 4: MPI synchronization overhead (in sec) 4 Scientific Kernels: NPB The NAS Parallel Benchmarks (NPB) [4, 11] provide a good middle ground for evaluating the performance of compact, well understood applications. The NPB were created at a time when vector machines were considered no longer cost effective, and although their performance was meant to be good across a whole range of systems, they were ....
D.H. Bailey et al. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks. Technical Report RNR-94-007, NASA Ames Research Center, 1994.
Parallel Expressiveness of the Spar Programming Language.. - Niemeijer (2000) (1 citation) Self-citation (Parallel Report) (Correct)
No context found.
D. Bailey, E. Barszcz, J. Barton, D. Browning, R. Carter, L. Dagum, R. Fatoohi, S. Fineberg, P. Frederickson, T. Lasinski, R. Schreiber, H. Simon, V. Venkatakrishnan, and S. Weeratunga. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks. Technical Report RNR-94-007, NASA Ames Research Center, Mo ett Field, CA, March 1994.
USENIX Association - General Track Usenix (1992) (2 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
D. Bailey, J. Barton, T. Lasinski, and H. Simon. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks. Technical Report RNR-91002, NASA Ames Research Center, 1991.
A Systematic Characterization of Application Sensitivity to.. - Martin (1999) (Correct)
No context found.
BAILEY, D. H., HARRIS, T., DER WIGNGAART, R. V., SAPHIR, W., WOO, A., AND YARROW, M. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks 2.0. Tech. Rep. NAS-95-010, NASA Ames Research Center, 1995.
A Systematic Characterization of Application Sensitivity to.. - Martin (1999) (Correct)
No context found.
BAILEY, D. H., HARRIS, T., DER WIGNGAART, R. V., SAPHIR, W., WOO, A., AND YARROW, M. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks 2.0. Tech. Rep. NAS-95-010, NASA Ames Research Center, 1995.
Hardware Support for Thread-Level Speculation - Steffan (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
D. Bailey, J. Barton, T. Lasinski, and H. Simon. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks. Technical Report RNR-91-002, NASA Ames Research Center, August 1991.
Co-Array Fortran Performance and Potential: An NPB - Experimental Study Cristian (Correct)
No context found.
Bailey, D., Harris, T., Saphir, W., van der Wijngaart, R., Woo, A., Yarrow, M.: The NAS parallel benchmarks 2.0. Technical Report NAS-95-020, NASA Ames Research Center (1995)
Renewed Hope for Data Parallelism: Unintegrated Support for Task.. - Deitz (2003) (1 citation) (Correct)
No context found.
D. Bailey, T. Harris, W. Saphir, R. van der Wijngaart, A. Woo, and M. Yarrow. The NAS parallel benchmarks 2.0. Technical report, NASA Ames Research Center (NAS-95-020), December 1995.
Identifying and Exploiting Spatial Regularity in.. - Mohan, de.. (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
BAILEY, D., BISWAS, R., AND DER WIJNGAART, R. V. NAS Applications and Advanced Architectures. Tech. Rep. NAS Technical Report NAS-97-031, NASA Ames Research Center, Nov. 1997.
Performance Estimation for Scheduling on Shared Networks - Shreenivasa Venkataramaiah .. (Correct)
No context found.
D. Bailey, T. Harris, W. Saphir, R. van der Wijngaart, A. Woo, and M. Yarrow. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks 2.0. Technical Report 95-020, NASA Ames Research Center, December 1995.
Automatic Parallelization of the Conjugate Gradient.. - Kotlyar, Pingali, Stodghill (Correct)
No context found.
D.H. Bailey, J.T. Barton, T.A. Lasinski, and H.D. Simon. The NAS parallel benchmarks. Technical Report RNR-91-02, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, January 1991.
A DRAM Backend for The Impulse Memory System - Lixin Zhang Uucs- (2000) (Correct)
No context found.
D. Bailey, E. Barszca, J. Barton, D. Browning, R. Carter, L. Dagum, R. Fatoohi, S. Fineberg, P. Frederickson, T. Lasinski, R. Schreiber, and H. Simon. The NAS parallel benchmarks. Technical Report RNR-94-007, NASA Ames Research Center, March 1994.
Operating System I/O Speculation: How two invocations are.. - Fraser, Chang (Correct)
No context found.
D. Bailey, J. Barton, T. Lasinski, and H. Simon. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks. Technical Report RNR-91-002, NASA Ames Research Center, 1991.
Co-Array Fortran Performance and Potential: An NPB - Experimental Study Cristian (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
Bailey, D., Harris, T., Saphir, W., van der Wijngaart, R., Woo, A., Yarrow, M.: The NAS parallel benchmarks 2.0. Technical Report NAS-95-020, NASA Ames Research Center (1995)
Transparent Operating System Support for Superpages - Navarro (2002) (4 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
D. Bailey, T. Harris, W. Saphir, R. van der Wijngaart, A. Woo, and M. Yarrow. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks 2.0. Report NAS-95-020, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 1995.
A DRAM Backend for The Impulse Memory System - Lixin Zhang Uucs- (2000) (Correct)
No context found.
D. Bailey, E. Barszca, J. Barton, D. Browning, R. Carter, L. Dagum, R. Fatoohi, S. Fineberg, P. Frederickson, T. Lasinski, R. Schreiber, and H. Simon. The NAS parallel benchmarks. Technical Report RNR-94-007, NASA Ames Research Center, March 1994.
Cross-Architecture Performance Predictions for Scientific.. - Marin, Mellor-Crummey (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
D. Bailey, T. Harris, W. Saphir, R. van der Wijngaart, A. Woo, and M. Yarrow. The NAS parallel benchmarks 2.0. Technical Report NAS-95-020, NASA Ames Research Center, Dec. 1995.
Exploiting Non-blocking Remote Memory Access.. - Tipparaju.. (1 citation) (Correct)
No context found.
D. Bailey, E. Barszcz, J. Barton, D. Browning, R. Carter, L. Dagum, R. Fatoohi, S. Fineberg, P. Frederickson, T. Lasinski, R. Schreiber, H. Simon, V. Venkatakrishnan, and S. Weeratunga, The NAS parallel benchmarks, Tech. Rep. RNR-94-007, NASA Ames Research Center, March 1994.
Hardware Support for Thread-Level Speculation - Steffan (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
D. Bailey, J. Barton, T. Lasinski, and H. Simon. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks. Technical Report RNR-91-002, NASA Ames Research Center, August 1991.
USENIX Association - General Track Usenix (1992) (2 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
D. Bailey, J. Barton, T. Lasinski, and H. Simon. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks. Technical Report RNR-91002, NASA Ames Research Center, 1991.
Dyn-MPI: Supporting MPI on Non Dedicated Clusters - Weatherly, Lowenthal.. (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
D. Bailey, J. Barton, T. Lasinski, and H. Simon. The NAS parallel benchmarks. RNR-91-002, NASA Ames Research Center, August 1991.
Characterizing NAS Benchmark Performance on Shared - Heterogeneous Networks Jaspal (Correct)
No context found.
BAILEY,D.,HARRIS,T.,SAPHIR,W.,VAN DER WIJNGAART,R.,WOO,A.,AND YARROW,M.The NAS Parallel Benchmarks 2.0. Tech. Rep. 95-020, NASA Ames Research Center, December 1995.
Early Performance Evaluation of the Cray X1 at Oak Ridge.. - Worley, Dunigan, Jr. (Correct)
No context found.
D. H. Bailey, T. Harris, R. F. V. der Wijngaart, W. Saphir, A. Woo, and M. Yarrow, The NAS Parallel Benchmarks 2.0, Tech. Rep. NAS-95-010, NASA Ames Research Center, Mo#ett Field, CA, 1995.
First 50 documents Next 50
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC