Gafos, Diamandis. 1996. The Articulatory Basis of Locality in Phonology. PhD dissertation, Johns Hopkins University. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Transparency, Strict Locality, and Targeted Constraints - Eric Bakovic And (Correct)
....approaches. We adopt the particular proposal developed within Optimality Theory ( OT ; Prince Smolensky 1993) by DNRYL ####### DFFRUGLQJ WR ZKLFK [ATR] harmony is driven by the markedness constraint AGREE(ATR) one of a general family of AGREE(F) constraints. 1 Crucially, following Gafos (1996) and N Choisin Padgett (1997) we claim that AGREE(ATR) requires only articulatorily adjacent vowels to harmonize with one another. 2) AGREE(ATR) Articulatorily adjacent vowels must have the same specification for the feature [ATR] As Gafos (1996) in particular argues at length (based ....
....constraints. 1 Crucially, following Gafos (1996) and N Choisin Padgett (1997) we claim that AGREE(ATR) requires only articulatorily adjacent vowels to harmonize with one another. 2) AGREE(ATR) Articulatorily adjacent vowels must have the same specification for the feature [ATR] As Gafos (1996) in particular argues at length (based largely on phonetic observations of hman 1966) the adjacency relationship recognized by We d like to thank Bruce Hayes, Donca Steriade, Matt Goldrick, members of the Rutgers Optimality Research Group, and the WCCFL audience. Errors are ours. 1. See ....
Gafos, Diamandis. 1996. The Articulatory Basis of Locality in Phonology. PhD dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.
Multiple Correspondence - Burzio (1996) (3 citations) (Correct)
....correspondence morphology makes no commitment to morphological patterns (here abstractions over classes) being necessarily concatenative . As such, it contemplates no special devices such as plane segregation to reconstruct discrete morphological entities in non concatenative languages (see Gafos, 1996 for relevant discussion and a critique of such devices) Cases that would involve subtractive morphological operations on traditional conceptions, such as the text case of the participles based on their infinitives, also do not challenge the correspondence approach, as the text implies. stand ....
Gafos, A. (1996) The Articulatory Basis of Locality in Phonology, Ph.D. Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.
Morpheme Structure Constraints and Paradigm Occultation - McCarthy (1998) (1 citation) (Correct)
....the analysis: categorical exclusion of non local spreading, as in (27b) and differences among consonants in ability to accommodate the spread feature, as in (27a) vs. 27c) Limitations of space preclude giving a complete account here, but I will briefly sketch the general approach. According to Gafos (1996), N Chiosin Padgett (1997) and others, autosegmental spreading is always strictly local, without exception and under all circumstances. In their view, spreading represents extension of a single articulatory gesture in the time domain, a process that is by its very nature strictly local. If this ....
Gafos, Adamantios. 1996. The Articulatory Basis of Locality in Phonology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University dissertation.
Temiar Reduplication in One-Level Prosodic Morphology - Walther (2000) (Correct)
No context found.
Diamandis Gafos. 1996. The articulatory basis of locality in phonology. Ph.D. thesis, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md. [Published by Garland: New York].
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC