R. J. Lickley and E. G. Bard, "On not recognizing disfluencies in dialogue," in Proceedings of 4th ICSLP, 1996.  Home/Search   Document Details and Download   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....very common phenomena. We report on the human abilities which make disfluencies evanescent. The portion of a disfluent utterance which must be expunged to make fair copy is called the reparandum. Though words in reparanda are processed [4] they may not be correctly identified by normal listeners [8]. Part of the problem appears to be due to the disfluent interruption itself. People may depend on subsequent as well as prior context when they recognize words in running spontaneous speech [5, 2] For words in the reparandum, the disfluent interruption truncates the subsequent context before the ....

....allow the words to be identified. In a word level gating experiment in which an utterance is presented starting with the first word and including an additional word on each trial, words in reparanda were so deficient in late delivered recognition that they proved exceptionally unintelligible [8]. The current work examines the evidence that failures of memory as well as failures of perception are involved in the human ability to miss disfluencies. A large scale verbatim transcription task was designed with two purposes. First, it checked for recognition failures in a more natural task ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

R.J. Lickley & E.G. Bard. "On not recognizing disfluencies in dialogue". In Proc ICSLP 96: 1876-1879, 1996.

No context found.

R. J. Lickley and E. G. Bard, "On not recognizing disfluencies in dialogue," in Proceedings of 4th ICSLP, 1996.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC